2002 PLP 570 (SCMR)
HAJI KHAN LASHARI and others ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2002 PLP 570 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Hamid Ali Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | HAJI KHAN LASHARI and others ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 570 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 570 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Hamid Ali Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 570 (SCMR) (HAJI KHAN LASHARI and others ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record and Shah Nawaz, Incharge Law, Pakistan Steel Mills for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 26th December, 2000.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art: 212(3)‑‑‑Payment of ad hoc salary‑‑‑Service Tribunal admitted appeal of civil servants for regular hearing, but declined them interim relief‑‑‑Civil servants filed petitions before Supreme Court against said order claiming that similar interim relief with regard to payment of ad hoc salary had been granted by it to another civil servant while disposing of his petition with consent of parties‑‑‑Held, that was a consent order, and since Authority was not willing to consent in the present proceedings, the relief given to another civil servant could not be given to petitioners‑‑‑Court further observed that petitioners were entitled to receive their final dues lying with the Authority on completion of legal formalities‑‑‑Supreme Court directed Service Tribunal to dispose of the appeals of civil servants on the date fixed or on subsequent date not later than three weeks thereafter‑‑‑Petitions for leave to appeal were disposed of accordingly. Petitioners in person.
Judgment & Decree
A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record and Shah Nawaz, Incharge Law, Pakistan Steel Mills for Respondents. Date of hearing: 26th December, 2000. NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, J.‑‑‑This order will dispose of Petitions Nos.575 to 685 and 697 to 701‑K of 2000 as common questions are involved in these matters. The petitioners were employees of Pakistan Steel‑ Mills and their ' services, en block, were terminated on 1‑2‑2000. They approached Management of the respondents and a Review Committee was constituted, which gave them interim relief in the way that they were allowed ad hoc salaries up to May, 2000. Thereafter, they approached Federal Service Tribunal for redress of their grievances. The Tribunal admitted their appeals, but declined any interim relief and fixed the matter for hearing on 16‑4‑2000, which date later on was changed to 18‑1‑2001. Against above order, the petitioners have approached this Court. It is pertinent to point out here that in a similar petition (CPLA No. 427‑K/2000) this Court, by consent, had passed an. order whereby interim relief was granted to petitioner Pasha Ahmed Gul., with regard to payment of ad hoc salary and the petition was disposed of in terms thereof. The petitioners contend that similar relief be allowed to them as was given to said Pasha Ahmed Gul. Learned counsel for the respondents has vehemently opposed above plea and stated that the respondents are not willing to extend said concession to the petitioners and that even the respondents have filed a review petition for withdrawal of said order. It was a consent order and since the respondents are not willing to consent in these petitions, the relief given to said Pasha Ahmed Gul cannot be given to these petitioners. Order accordingly. It is an admitted position that the final dues of the petitioners are lying with the respondents and they are entitled to receive said dues, subject to completion of legal formalities, without prejudice to any of their legal rights, they will be entitled to draw back their final dues from the respondents who shall pay the same to them as early as possible. The appeals of the petitioners are already fixed before Federal Service Tribunal on 18th January, 2001, which may be disposed of on that particular date or on subsequent date not later than three weeks thereafter. In above terms, the petitions stand disposed of. S.A.K./M.A.K./H‑42/S ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.