MLD 2003

2003 PLP 1130 (MLD)

SOBOO and 5 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2002-December-9
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2003 PLP 1130 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties SOBOO and 5 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 1130 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 1130 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 1130 (MLD) (SOBOO and 5 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.380, 457, 324 & 429

Bail, grant of

One of the accused persons was allegedly caught by complainant party at the place of incident alongwith gun and live cartridges were also recovered from his possession

At bail stage it could not be said that said accused was not guilty of offence with which he stood charged

Bail was refused to said accused

Remaining five accused were alleged to have run away after complainant party chased them to apprehend them

Said accused persons though were said to have fired from their respective arms on complainant party, but no injury was suffered by anybody from complainant party

Said remaining five accused were admitted to bail.

Judgment & Decree

Muhammad Ayaz Soomro for Applicants. Mushtaque Ahmed Kourejo for the State. It is alleged that the applicants were seen by complainant Nazal and others while they were driving: away the cow of the complainant Nazal from his house, after having trespassed into the same and making preparation to commit such an offence and while Khuda Bux, Hamzo and Zulfiqar Ali applicants were armed with guns, applicant Soboo was also armed with gun, Mumtaz Ali and Ali Gul were armed with Kalashnikov rifles and further that when complainant and others raised cries, the applicants allegedly fired the klashnikov rifle and the guns straight towards the complainant party, which attracted witnesses Abdul Ghafoor and others; P.W. Abdul Ghafoor fired from his gun upon the culprits which made them to leave the said cow at the place of incident, and then they started to run away but they were encircled by the complainant party and applicant Soboo was duly caught alongwith his gun, whereas remaining culprits made good their escape; six live cartridges were also recovered from his possession; three dogs of the complainant party died during the incident while the applicants allegedly fired their fire-arms. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Kourejo learned State Counsel has opposed the grant of the ball. It is contended on behalf of the applicants that applicants Ali Gul, Mumtaz Ali, Zulfiqar Ali and Hamza Ali are respectable persons and they voluntarily surrendered themselves before the trial Court, whereby they were remanded to custody and thus, no recovery is made alleged from them; it is further contended that though applicants allegedly fired their -respective fire-arms yet none from the complainant party sustained any injury. Applicant Soboo was allegedly caught by the complainant party at the place of incident alongwith gun and live cartridges were also recovered by them from his possession. Hence at this stage of the case, it cannot be said that he is not guilty of the offence with which he stands charged. With regard to the remaining five accused/applicants, they are alleged to have run away after the complainant party chased them to apprehend them and, though they are said to have fired from their respective fire-arms on the complainant party, yet, no injury is suffered by any body from the complainant party. Accordingly, remaining five applicants namely Khuda Bux, Ali Gul, Mumtaz Ali, Zulfiqar Ali and Hamz Ali are admitted to bail, each in the sum of Rs.100,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S-290/K Order accordingly.