SCMR 1976

1976 PLP 321 (SCMR)

ABDUL QAYYAM ‑‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER — Despondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Salahuddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1976 PLP 321 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Salahuddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ
Parties ABDUL QAYYAM ‑‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER — Despondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLP 321 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLP 321 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Salahuddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLP 321 (SCMR) (ABDUL QAYYAM ‑‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER — Despondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Rana Maqbool Ahmed Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.

Judgment & Decree

SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J. ‑‑The petitioner has been aggrieved by an order of a learned Single Judge of the Peshawar High Court dismissing the petitioner's revision petition and maintaining his conviction and sentence of 3 months' rigorous imprisonment under section 406 of the Pakistan Penal Code. The trying Magistrate, the learned Sessions Judge and the learned Judge of the High Court, they all found that there was evidence in support of the petitioner's conviction. The entrustment of the ornaments was proved and it has not been disputed before us. It has also been proved that the petitioner refused to pay their price or return the ornaments. In these circumstances there is no substance in the contention that there was no misappropriation. The petitioner next sought to question the territorial jurisdiction, of the Magistrate to try the, case. No objection to jurisdiction having been taken at any previous stage of the case we do not permit him to raise the question before us for the first time. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Petition dismissed.