1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
KHURSHID AHMED Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman, Ghulam Mujaddid Isran and Allahdin, Members |
| Parties | KHURSHID AHMED Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and another |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman, Ghulam Mujaddid Isran and Allahdin, Members.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (KHURSHID AHMED Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rao Shakir Naqshbandi for Appellant.
- Habibur Rasheed for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 16th September, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973...
R. 4
Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), S. 4
Charges against civil servant that he was in the habit of availing leave without sanction; that he had remained absent from duty unauthorisedly; that he had no interest in Government service and that he had drawn pay for the period for which he had applied for extraordinary leave, had fully been proved
Civil servant's reply to show-cause notice was conspicuously silent with regard to such charges
Civil servant thus deserved penalty of removal from service which had been awarded to him in consequence of disciplinary action taken against him.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 9 of 1991, decided on 26th September, 1991. Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973...
R. 4
Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), S. 4
Charges against civil servant that he was in the habit of availing leave without sanction; that he had remained absent from duty unauthorisedly; that he had no interest in Government service and that he had drawn pay for the period for which he had applied for extraordinary leave, had fully been proved
Civil servant's reply to show-cause notice was conspicuously silent with regard to such charges
Civil servant thus deserved penalty of removal from service which had been awarded to him in consequence of disciplinary action taken against him. Rao Shakir Naqshbandi for Appellant. Habibur Rasheed for Respondents. Date of hearing: 16th September, 1991.