1989 PLP 1131 (SCMR)
LAL and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ASHIO HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1131 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Usman Ali Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | LAL and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ASHIO HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (19731‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1131 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (19731‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1131 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Usman Ali Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1131 (SCMR) (LAL and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ASHIO HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rana MAkram, Advocate and Manzoor Elahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Mirza Anwar Beg, Advocate and MA. Siddique, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 10th April, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 10th January, 1988 of the Lahore High Court in R.FA. No.153 of 1987). ‑‑‑Art.185‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXIII, R.3‑‑Petition for leave to Appeal‑‑Pre‑emption‑‑Compromise‑‑Parties having entered into compromise out of Court, their counsel requested for the disposal of the petition m terms of compromise‑‑Counsel also stated that the compromise was genuine and that there was no impediment in its acceptance and made into order of the Court‑ Supreme Court converted petition into appeal and disposed of the same in terms of agreement.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑In this vendees/defendants' petition for leave to appeal arising out of a pre‑emption matter the parties having entered into a compromise out of Court, their learned counsel have requested for the disposal of the petition in terms of the compromise. The compromise contained in the application moved in this behalf reads as follows:‑‑ "The parties in the above case have reached a compromise, to the effect that the above petition be converted into appeal and the appeal be accepted. The respondents who are plaintiffs/pre‑emptors in the original suit filed, humbly withdraw their suit. Also the law has been laid down by this Honourable Court in the case reported as "Ghulam Qadir v. Nawab Din" P L D 1988 S C 701 on the basis of which the judgments of the Courts below cannot be sustained and may be set aside. The parties therefore pray accordingly." Both the learned counsel state that the compromise is genuine and that there is no impediment in its acceptance and made into order of the Court. Accordingly this petition is converted into appeal and disposed of in terms of the above reproduced compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. M.BA./L‑22/S Order accordingly.