1985 PLP 634 (SCMR)
NAZIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus ABDUL QAYYUM BHATTI and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1985 PLP 634 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ |
| Parties | NAZIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus ABDUL QAYYUM BHATTI and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 634 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 634 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 634 (SCMR) (NAZIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus ABDUL QAYYUM BHATTI and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Iftikhar Ahmad Dar, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 10th August, 1981.
- Iftikhar Ahmad Dar, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the order, dated 10th February, 1980 of Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No. 163 of 1980).
Art.185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXIX, r.1--Refusal to grant interim injunction--No serious question of law being involved, Supreme Court declined to interfere--Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXIX, r.1‑‑Refusal to grant interim injunction‑‑No serious question of law being involved, Supreme Court declined to interfere‑‑Leave to appeal refused. Iftikhar Ahmad Dar, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 10th August, 1981. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑ The facts giving rise to the present Petition are briefly, that Nazir Ahmad, petitioner, filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondents, which is still pending ire the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Gujrat. Along with the plaint he filed an application for grant of temporary injunction. Initially, the learned Senior Civil Judge passed a status quo order in petitioner's favour, but subsequently on 30‑10‑1979, he vacated the same. The petitioner filed an appeal against the refusal of the interim relief by the learned Senior Civil Judge, which was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Gujrat, on 2‑2‑1980. The petitioner filed Civil Revision against this order in the High Court, which too, was dismissed in limine by a learned Single Judge of the High Court. Hence the present petition.
2. We, have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and,, considered the facts of he case. We do not think this a fit case for interference with the orders of the courts below in refusing to grant interim relief to the petitioner, specially when it has not been shown that it involves any serious question of law. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. M.I. Petition dismissed.