2008 PLP 1133 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD SALEEM and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 PLP 1133 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SALEEM and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 1133 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 1133 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 1133 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD SALEEM and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- This application was filed on 11-11-2006. The office diaries show that the matter was fixed on 8-12-2006 when the learned advocate for the applicant had sought adjournment from the Court. Again this matter was fixed on 22-1-2007 when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate for the applicants had stated that he has not brought the case law to be quoted and as such he had sought adjournment. The matter was again fixed on 12-2-2007 when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate for the applicants had sought time to file copies of two F.I.Rs. and two investigation reports. Again this matter was fixed on 26-2-2007 when Mr. Khursheed Anwar, Advocate held brief on behalf of Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate and had sought adjournment. Again matter was fixed on 5-4-2007 when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate was called absent. Matter was again fixed on 16-8-2007, when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate was called, absent. Again on 19-9-2007 Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi Advocate was called, absent and today this matter is fixed. Mr. Amir Mansoob Qureshi, Advocate is present on behalf of the Complainant. Mr. Asadullah Baloch, learned State counsel is also present. Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi is called absent, he has not filed the copies of two F.I.Rs. and two investigation reports as is mentioned in the case diary, dated 12-2-2007.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 561-A
Quashing of order, application for
Order sought to be quashed was in accordance with law as per record, which did not need any interference by the High Court
Application for quashing of such order being not maintainable, was dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
KHAWAJA NAVEED AHMED, J.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the applicants Muhammad Saleem and Muhammad Intizar seeking the quashment of order, dated 5-5-2006 of the learned 1st ADJ, Karachi Central, who had declined to grant of permission letter of lodging the second F.I.R. on the ground that the same was not available with him. This application was filed on 11-11-2006. The office diaries show that the matter was fixed on 8-12-2006 when the learned advocate for the applicant had sought adjournment from the Court. Again this matter was fixed on 22-1-2007 when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate for the applicants had stated that he has not brought the case law to be quoted and as such he had sought adjournment. The matter was again fixed on 12-2-2007 when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate for the applicants had sought time to file copies of two F.I.Rs. and two investigation reports. Again this matter was fixed on 26-2-2007 when Mr. Khursheed Anwar, Advocate held brief on behalf of Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate and had sought adjournment. Again matter was fixed on 5-4-2007 when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate was called absent. Matter was again fixed on 16-8-2007, when Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate was called, absent. Again on 19-9-2007 Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi Advocate was called, absent and today this matter is fixed. Mr. Amir Mansoob Qureshi, Advocate is present on behalf of the Complainant. Mr. Asadullah Baloch, learned State counsel is also present. Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi is called absent, he has not filed the copies of two F.I.Rs. and two investigation reports as is mentioned in the case diary, dated 12-2-2007. I have perused the contents of .the memo. of petition as well as the order of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi Central. The order of the learned 1st ADJ, Karachi Central is in accordance with law and does not need any interference by this Court. The Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.224 of 2006 is not maintainable and is dismissed in limine with all pending miscellaneous applications. H.B.T./M-44/K Application dismissed.