2001 P Cr (PLP)
MAQSOOD JAVED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhary, J |
| Parties | MAQSOOD JAVED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhary, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (MAQSOOD JAVED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M.A. Zafar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302/34‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Police after having found the accused innocent during investigation had recommended his discharge from the case‑‑‑Co‑accused was not traceable‑‑‑Case of accused on' account of result of investigation was one of further inquiry‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. Mian Saeed‑ud‑Din for the State.
Judgment & Decree
M.A. Zafar for Petitioner. Mian Saeed‑ud‑Din for the State. Criminal case F.I.R. No.470, dated 13‑9‑2000 was registered at Police Station Thikriwala, Faisalabad, under section 302/34, P.P.C. on the report of Asghar Ali. According to complainant, he was returning from Imam Bargah to their village alongwith Muhammad Ilyas and others. When they reached near a field having cotton crop belonging to Mehmood a co -villager, Maqsood, petitioner armed with pistol and an unknown person also armed with pistol emerged out of the cotton crop. The petitioner shouted whereafter his companion fired at Muhammad Ilyas, who fell down. Maqsood Javed, petitioner also tired twice at Muhammad Ilyas. The complainant and the P. Ws. were also statingly threatened by the accused. The motive for the incident was stated to be that Murad Ali, father of the complainant was murdered about 44/45 years back by grandfather of Maqsood Javed and due to that grievance, he had murdered Muhammad Ilyas.
2. Petitioner was arrested and seeks post‑arrest bail in the matter.
3. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard and record seen.
4. The petitioner was found innocent during the investigation conducted and the police recommended for discharge of the accused from the case. The co‑accused of the petitioner was not even traced by the police in the course of investigation. The case of the petitioner on account of result of investigation is considered to be that of further inquiry.
5. The petitioner is allowed ball in the sum of rupees one lac with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. N.H.Q./M‑644/L Bail allowed.