1986 PLP 2017 (SCMR)
KHAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 2017 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Abdul Qadir Shaikh, JJ |
| Parties | KHAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 2017 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 2017 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Abdul Qadir Shaikh, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 2017 (SCMR) (KHAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Rafiq Khan Chohan, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 19th November, 1985.
- Muhammad Rafiq Khan Chohan, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 185(3)--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 498--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 354-A/34--Bail, cancellation of--High Court cancelling bail of accused under S. 451-A/34, P.P.C. -No violation of any provision or principle of law--Supreme Court declined to interfere- Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑This is a 'petition for leave to appeal from the order of a learned Judge of Lahore High Court, dated 12‑10‑1985 cancelling petitioner's bail which was granted to him by the Sessions Judge, Khushab. Petitioner is an accused along with three others in a case under section 354‑A read with section 34, P.P.C. which is awaiting trial. After having heard the learn' counsel for the petitioner in the light of the record before us, we find that by cancelling petitioner's bail learned Judge has not violated any provision or principle of law. There is, therefore, no valid justification for this Court to interfere. The petition is dismissed. M.I. Petition dismissed.