1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ABDUL MAJEED Versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | ABDUL MAJEED Versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ABDUL MAJEED Versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Yasin Bhatti for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents
- Date of hearing: 21st April, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Some quantity of wheat purchased by civil servant as Foodgrains Supervisor, was found short and civil servant was proceeded departmentally and as a result of such proceedings penalty of total recovery of loss was imposed on him
Civil servant had not taken necessary precautionary measures such as timely fumigation and had not sent stocks condition reports to supervisory officers earlier
Stocks of wheat were infested because of slackness and negligence of civil servant as he did not request his supervisors for early allocation
Civil servant could not produce any document to show that condition of godowns in which wheat was stocked, was such that effective fumigation was not possible
Civil servant, in view of negligence and slackness shown by him in keeping supervisory officers informed o condition of stocks, would not deserve any leniency
Penalty of total recovery as a result of departmental proceedings initiated against civic servant was thus rightly imposed on him.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 574 of 1989, decided on 14th May, 1991. Civil service
Some quantity of wheat purchased by civil servant as Foodgrains Supervisor, was found short and civil servant was proceeded departmentally and as a result of such proceedings penalty of total recovery of loss was imposed on him
Civil servant had not taken necessary precautionary measures such as timely fumigation and had not sent stocks condition reports to supervisory officers earlier
Stocks of wheat were infested because of slackness and negligence of civil servant as he did not request his supervisors for early allocation
Civil servant could not produce any document to show that condition of godowns in which wheat was stocked, was such that effective fumigation was not possible
Civil servant, in view of negligence and slackness shown by him in keeping supervisory officers informed o condition of stocks, would not deserve any leniency
Penalty of total recovery as a result of departmental proceedings initiated against civic servant was thus rightly imposed on him. Muhammad Yasin Bhatti for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents Date of hearing: 21st April, 1991.