1970 PLP 65 (SCMR)
RIAZ K. HAQ AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus SAID K. HAQ-Respondent
| Citation | 1970 PLP 65 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RIAZ K. HAQ AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus SAID K. HAQ-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1970 PLP 65 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1970 PLP 65 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1970 PLP 65 (SCMR) (RIAZ K. HAQ AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus SAID K. HAQ-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mohammad Shafi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mushtaq Ahmad Khawaja, Senior Attorney for Petitioners.
- Hakim Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Siddiq, Senior Attorney for Respondent.
- Date of hearing : 10th October 1967.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 13th March 1967, in Civil Revision No 197 of 1962). Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3) read with Supreme Court Rules. 1956, O. XXXV Petition for Special Leave to Appeal, on request of parties, adjourned sine die.
Judgment & Decree
CORNELIUS, C. J.‑This order may be read in continuation of our order of yesterday in this case. Mr. M. Shafi states the following facts. The Registrar of Lahore District made an order for registration of the award, but the opposite‑party moved a writ in the High Court, and registration has been stayed, pending disposal of the petition. It becomes necessary to adjourn the hearing of this petition, until the final result of the writ petition is known. If the Registrar's older is maintained, the petitioner's could then move for further proceedings in their application before the Civil Judge in respect of the award, once it is registered. It is, there fore, necessary to keep the latter proceedings alive. This petition is adjourned sine die. Either party may apply to have it heard, if and when a decision is reached in the writ petition before the High Court. In the meantime no final order shall be made in the proceedings for making the award a rule of Court, which are pending in the Court of the Civil Judge. Petition adjourned sine die.