1989 PLP 1126 (SCMR)
INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, N.‑W.F.P., PESHAWAR and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1126 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Mullah, Usman Ali Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, N.‑W.F.P., PESHAWAR and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | North‑West Frontier Province Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1126 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: North‑West Frontier Province Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1126 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Mullah, Usman Ali Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1126 (SCMR) (INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, N.‑W.F.P., PESHAWAR and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian M. Ajmal, Additional Advocate‑General, N.‑W.F.P. instructed by Noor Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 15th April, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 16th April. 1988 of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal in Appeal No.33 of 1987). ‑‑‑R.12‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine whether R.12 had barred the jurisdiction of North‑West Frontier Province Service Tribunal to entertain appeal filed by Police employee against his dismissal subject to further examination of the question of limitation in connection with which the petitioner had been permitted to give further facts and details of the grounds taken in the application for condonation of delay. C. P. 200‑P of 1988 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal having beer granted in CP‑200‑P of 1988, inter alia, for the examination of a question which has been raised in the present petition, we grant leave to appeal in this case also. The point for examination, inter alia, is; whether. Rule 12 of the N.‑W.F.P. Police Rules, 1975 had barred the jurisdiction of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal to entertain the Service Appeal filed by Muhammad Yousaf respondent against his dismissal. Leave is accordingly granted subject to further examination of the question of limitation in connection with which the petitioner has been permitted to give further facts and details of the grounds taken in the application for condonation of delay. Both the appeals arising out of this and the aforementioned petition shall be heard together on the present record with direction to the parties to file all additional documents which would be necessary for disposal of the appeals. M.B.A./I‑72/S Leave granted.