1975 PLP R130 (SCMR)
IMTIAZ ULLAH — Petitioner Versus RAFIQ AHMAD AND OTHERS — Respondents
| Citation | 1975 PLP R130 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | IMTIAZ ULLAH — Petitioner Versus RAFIQ AHMAD AND OTHERS — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Bail |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1975 PLP R130 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Bail as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1975 PLP R130 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1975 PLP R130 (SCMR) (IMTIAZ ULLAH — Petitioner Versus RAFIQ AHMAD AND OTHERS — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Arif, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate- on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 4th December 1974.
- Muhammad Arif, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑ on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated the 10th April 1974, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 827/8 of 1974). --Bail granted by High Court to person accused of offence under S. 363, P. P. C.-Cancellation of bail prayed for on ground of boy kidnapped by accused being recovered and boy supporting complaint of his father-Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by High Court.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑
The High Court has granted bail to the respondents who are charged under section 363, P. P. C. It is contended by Mr. Arif that the young son of the petitioner has since been recovered who has supported the complaint made by his father that respondent No. 1 had abducted him and given him to kharkars who subjected him to forced labour for over two years. The grounds on which bail has been granted by the High Court continue to hold good notwithstanding the appearance of the complainant's son. Nor will grant of bail reflect on the question of innocence or guilt of the respondents as the decision of the case will's eventually depend upon the merits of the evidence led by the prosecution. Leave to appeal is refused and the petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed.