YLR 2016

2016 PLP 2460 (YLR)

Qazi FIDA-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Peshawar (Bannu Bench)
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 123-B of 2016, decided on 20th April, 2016.
Honorable Judges
Haider Ali Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2016 PLP 2460 (YLR)
Forum / Court Peshawar (Bannu Bench)
Bench Members Haider Ali Khan, J
Parties Qazi FIDA-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 PLP 2460 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 PLP 2460 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar (Bannu Bench) bench comprising: Haider Ali Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 PLP 2460 (YLR) (Qazi FIDA-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • M. Anwar Khan Maidadkhel for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.409 & 420

Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5(2)

Criminal breach of trust by public servant, cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, embezzlement

Accused was alleged to be instrumental in purchasing substandard wheat thereby causing loss of Rs.1,46,25,000 to the Government Exchequer

Accused was also charged for embezzlement

Case against accused fell within the ambit of further inquiry and, it would be seen at the trial as to whether accused was responsible for the wrong doings attributed to him in the auditor's report

Accused being government official, there was no likelihood of his abscondance

Accused was released on bail, in circumstances. Bashir-ur-Rehman Burki State Counsel.

Judgment & Decree

HAIDER ALI KHAN, J.

Petitioner Qazi Fida ur Rehman seeks his post arrest bail in case FIR No.01 dated 18.3.2016 under sections 409/420, P.P.C. read with 5(2), P.C. Act at Police Station ACE, Bannu.

2. Arguments heard and record gone through.

3. The accused is serving as District Food Controller at Bannu who was arrested vide FIR mentioned above, mainly on the report of senior auditor which reads as: "It is declared that 450 MT wheat (450000 KGs x 32.50 per KG)= costing Rs.1,46,25000/- have been embezzled and the DFC concerned is responsible." It is also alleged in the FIR that he was instrumental in purchasing substandard wheat and thereby caused loss of Rs.1,46,25000/- to the Government exchequer.

4. The learned counsel appearing for accused vehemently denied the allegations and stated that as regard to the first charge of purchasing substandard wheat, same was sent to the Government Public Analysts, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, who denied the allegation and the sample of wheat were found to be of normal quality. The detail is given below:- "I have analysed the said sample and declare the results of my analysis to be as follow: Taste Normal Colour Normal Smell Normal Foreign Matter 2.8% Foreign Food Grains 2.5% Damaged Grains 6.5% Insect Damaged Grains 1.7% Sound Grains 89.0% Moisture 10.4% Opinion

1. The sample conforms to the standards prescribed in the Pure food rules 1965.

2. The sample is not injurious to health

3. The sample is fit for human consumptions

4. The sample should be utilized without further delay."

5. According to the arguments that huge purchase was made in view of the impending operation and IDPs crises and the Government Storage facilities were not enough and some of the wheat was stored in private places like Flour Mills etc.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State contended that another FIR has been lodged against the same accused on which he has obtained bail from the Police Station Anti-Corruption Establishment, Peshawar.

7. In view of the above submissions and perusal of the record divulges that the case in hand falls within the ambit of further inquiry and it will be seen at the trial as to whether the accused is responsible for the wrong doings attributed to him in the auditor report. As the accused is Government official, therefore, there is no likelihood of his abscondance.

8. For the reasons discussed herein above, this bail petition is accepted and the accused/petitioner is released on bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (five lac) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Illaqa/Judicial Magistrate/MOD concerned. HBT/206/P Bail granted.