1999 PLP 1273 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD NADEEM and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1999 PLP 1273 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NADEEM and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 1273 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 1273 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 1273 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD NADEEM and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- The learned Advocate for the applicant has requested for bail on the ground that the name of applicants do not appear in the F.I.R. and there is no 161 statement of any witness to connect them with the alleged crime. Mr. Habib Ahmed for the State submits that there is no specific statement of any witness against the applicants but there is general allegations that the applicants are also involved.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.435/440/427/147/148/149
Bail, grant of--Accused were not nominated in the F.I.R.
Prosecution witnesses had not specifically implicated the accused in the commission of the offence
Case against accused, in circumstances, had scope for further inquiry and they were allowed bail accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
S.497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.435/440/427/147/148/149
Bail, grant of--Accused were not nominated in the F.I.R.
Prosecution witnesses had not specifically implicated the accused in the commission of the offence
Case against accused, in circumstances, had scope for further inquiry and they were allowed bail accordingly. Syed Mahmood Alam Rizvi for Applicants. Habib Ahmed for the State. The F.I.R. in this case was registered on 26-11-1995 for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 440 and 437, P.P.C. The complainant A.S.I. Muhammad Shabbir has stated in the F.I.R. that while on patrolling duty he found high-roof vehicle bearing No.CJ-4152 which was parked there was set ablaz by 14/15 armed boys by using petrol. He has mentioned names of accused Amir Ullah, Zeeshan Hakla, Waseem, Shahid Afroz, Aslam, Salahuddin alias Salah, Javed Bichho and Sami. The learned Advocate for the applicant has requested for bail on the ground that the name of applicants do not appear in the F.I.R. and there is no 161 statement of any witness to connect them with the alleged crime. Mr. Habib Ahmed for the State submits that there is no specific statement of any witness against the applicants but there is general allegations that the applicants are also involved. As the names of applicants are not mentioned in the F.I.R. then P.Ws. have not specifically implicated them. There is scope for further enquiry. We, therefore, grant them bail subject to furnishing of surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 by each and P.R Bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./M-200/K Bail allowed.