2003 PLP 2682 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD HASHIM and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2003 PLP 2682 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Sadiq Leghari, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD HASHIM and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 2682 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 2682 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Sadiq Leghari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 2682 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD HASHIM and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- As regards Hashim Panhwar, his learned Advocate has contended that no evidence, whatsoever, connecting this applicant has been collected by the prosecution. Mr. Anwar Ansari, learned State Counsel also states that no evidence has been collected against Muhammad Hashim Panhwar. He (Muhammad Hashim Panhwar), therefore, has a case for bail. Bail granted to him. He shall be released on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
- Bail application of Muhammad Hashim Jamali has not been pressed by the learned Advocate for the time being and the same is dismissed as not pressed.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.394/511
No evidence whatsoever connecting the accused had been collected by prosecution
Accused having case for grant of bail was admitted to bail-- Bail application of other accused having not been pressed by his counsel, same was dismissed as not pressed. Shafi Muhammad Memon for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Shafi Muhammad Memon for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State. Prosecution case is that on 4-11-2002 Muharram Ali Abro was returning from Dadu to his village on a motorcycle. He had his licensed Revolver with him. On the way at 7-00 p.m., when he arrived near village Imam Bux Abro, three bandits intercepted him and attempted to rob him of his motorcycle. In the light of the motorcycle, he identified the culprits to be Hashim Jamali equipped with Lathi, Deenoo Lund with pistol and Daud Lund with Lathi. Moharram Ali resisted and was given Lathi blows. In his defence he opened fire, which hit Hashim Jamali. The culprits then ran away. Moharram Ali then reported the matter to Dadu Police and was referred to Civil Hospital, Dadu for examination and treatment. On 5-11-2002 at 12-15 noon his F.I.R. was registered. Accused Hashim Jamali was also treated at Civil Hospital, Dadu. After investigation, Hashim Jmali, Hashim Panhwar and Roshan Abro were challaned. Deenoo and Daud were let off being innocent. The bail applications of Muhammad Hashim Jamali and Muhammad Hashim Panhwar were dismissed by common order dated 6-11-2002 by the learned IV-Additional Sessions Judge, Dadu. After that present application has been filed. As regards Hashim Panhwar, his learned Advocate has contended that no evidence, whatsoever, connecting this applicant has been collected by the prosecution. Mr. Anwar Ansari, learned State Counsel also states that no evidence has been collected against Muhammad Hashim Panhwar. He (Muhammad Hashim Panhwar), therefore, has a case for bail. Bail granted to him. He shall be released on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Bail application of Muhammad Hashim Jamali has not been pressed by the learned Advocate for the time being and the same is dismissed as not pressed. H.B.T./M-524/K Order accordingly.