1985 PLP (1) (MLD)
STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN — Applicant Versus ZOR ENGINEERS LTD. and 3 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1985 PLP (1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Amjad Khan, J |
| Parties | STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN — Applicant Versus ZOR ENGINEERS LTD. and 3 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP (1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP (1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Amjad Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP (1) (MLD) (STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN — Applicant Versus ZOR ENGINEERS LTD. and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ---Ss. 24 & 151--Transfer application--Trial Court submitting monthly statements of proceedings and counsel for petitioner satisfied with progress but suggesting that if in circumstances a direction to trial Judge for expeditious disposal of case was issued he would not press application--Direction issued to trial Judge to avoid grant of lengthy adjournments and expedite proceedings--Transfer application disposed of as having borne fruit and not pressed.
- Maqsood-ul-Hassan for Respondent No.2.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1, 3 and 4.
- Date of hearing: 28th November, 1984.
Headnotes / Summary
M.A. Rehman and M.A. Zafar for Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
M.A. Rehman and M.A. Zafar for Applicant. Maqsood-ul-Hassan for Respondent No.2. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1, 3 and
4. Date of hearing: 28th November, 1984. After perusing the monthly statements of proceedings submitted by the trial Court, learned counsel states that he is satisfied with the progress and suggests that in the circumstances a direction to the learned trial Judge to cause expeditious disposal of the suits will suffice and in that case he will not be interested in pressing this application. Learned trial Judge is directed to avoid grant of lengthy adjournments and to expedite proceedings so as to be able to decide the cases preferably within 6 months from today and in any case not later the onset of the coming summer vacation, with intimation to this Court. He may, if the exigencies of 'situation so require, take day to day proceedings. In the meanwhile submission of monthly statements of proceedings is dispensed with. Transfer application is disposed of as having borne fruit and not pressed. No order as to costs. M.Y.H. Application disposed of.