P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 360 (PLP)
Messrs MUMTAZ INDUSTRIES and others — Petitioners Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 360 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Messrs MUMTAZ INDUSTRIES and others — Petitioners Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 360 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 360 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 360 (PLP) (Messrs MUMTAZ INDUSTRIES and others — Petitioners Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khadim Nadeem Malik for Petitioners (in both the Cases)
Headnotes / Summary
S. 35(3)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 203-D
Provision of S.35(3), Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is repugnant to the injunctions of Islam as it provided award of interest on costs.
Judgment & Decree
TANZIL-UR-RAHMAN, CJ.
This petition was admitted on 16-12-1991 to regular hearing to examine provision of section 35 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, whether or not the said provision is repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam. A notice to the respondent Government was issued on 24-12-1991 which appears to have been received on 26-12-1991 but neither any written statement has been filed nor anyone is present on behalf of the respondent Government. Perhaps in view of our detailed judgment dated 14-11-1991 in Shariat Petition No.30/I of 1990 (Dr. Mehmoodur Rahman Faisal v. Federation of Pakistan and others), on various laws including various provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, it appears that the concerned Government might not have liked to contest the matter.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to section 35(3) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, which envisages the awarding of costs with interest at a rate not exceeding 6%, per annum. It seems advantageous to reproduce the said provision of law which reads as under:- "35(3). The Court may give interest on costs at any rate not exceeding six per cent per annum, and such Interest shall be added to the costs and shall be recoverable as such."
3. For the detailed reasons stated in our aforesaid judgment dated 14-11-1991, we declare that the above provision of section 35(3) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, is repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam as laid down in the `Holy Our'an and Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.). The petition is accepted to the extent of repugnancy of interest on costs.
4. The above judgment will take effect after six months from today and unless the provision relating to interest is deleted, it will cease to be effective on the expiry of the aforesaid period of six months. M.B.A./665/FSC Petition accepted.