1987 PLP 3173 (MLD)
AHMAD YAR and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 3173 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | AHMAD YAR and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 3173 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 3173 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 3173 (MLD) (AHMAD YAR and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shamshir Iqbal Chughtai for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16--Bail, grant of--Alleged abductee a sui juris and having married a person accused of abduction--Nikahnama produced in support of plea of marriage--Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. M . A . Hamid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16--Bail, grant of--Alleged abductee a sui juris and having married a person accused of abduction--Nikahnama produced in support of plea of marriage--Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. Shamshir Iqbal Chughtai for Petitioners. M . A . Hamid for the State. The petitioners have been arrested under section 10/16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 and section 368, PPC. They have petitioned for being released on bail. 2. The facts narrated in the F.I.R. in substance are that Mst. Sheedan Bibi the daughter of Waryam complainant who is a divorcee used to live in her parental home. On the night intervening 12/13th March, 1987, she slipped away from the house and on her search Noor Ahmad and Ghulam Muhammad told the complainant that she was seen going with the petitioners and one Maqbool. The apprehension of the complainant was that Maqbool had abducted her for the purpose of rape. 3. Mst. Sheedan is sui juris and according to the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners Mst. Sheedan has married Maqbool Ahmad and a copy of the nikah nama has been produced. In the circumstances, the petitioners are allowed bail in the sum Of A Rs. 10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A. C. /Duty Magistrate, Minchinabad till the disposal of the case against them. S.G.D./A-194/L Bail allowed.