1980 PLP 681 (SCMR)
MESSRS ZAHEER ANWAR ETC. — Petitioner Versus S. M. ABBASI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
| Citation | 1980 PLP 681 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | MESSRS ZAHEER ANWAR ETC. — Petitioner Versus S. M. ABBASI AND ANOTHER-Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1980 PLP 681 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1980 PLP 681 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1980 PLP 681 (SCMR) (MESSRS ZAHEER ANWAR ETC. — Petitioner Versus S. M. ABBASI AND ANOTHER-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Hamid Ali Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 11th February, 1980.
- Hamid Ali Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 8-4-1979, in R. S. A. No. 210/79). Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) - S. 47-Compromise reached by parties quite lawful-Petition disposed of in terms thereof.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ‑ S. 47‑Compromise reached by parties quite lawful‑Petition disposed of in terms thereof. Hamid Ali Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents. Date of hearing : 11th February, 1980. KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J.‑The parties have compromised in this way that "the petitioners would hand over possession of one room with attached bath (which were the subject matter of the previous ejectment application against Muhammad Shareef (respondent No. 2) to S. M. A. Abbasi (respondent No. 1) within two days. There is another room on the spot adjacent to the aforesaid portion. The petitioners are allowed to retain that room as a tenant under S. M. A. Abbasi (respondent No. 1). The petitioners accept S. M. A. Abbasi as their landlord and the latter accepts the former as his tenant. This relationship will be regulated by the law of the landlord and tenant as in force in this urban area. The possession of the portion, which the petitioners are to vacate will be handed over to respondent No. 1 within two days.
2. The compromise as recorded above is quite lawful. The petition stands disposed of in terms thereof leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Petition dismissed.