YLR 2007

2007 PLP 227 (YLR)

MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7374/B and 7642/B of 2005, decided on 2nd February, 2006.
Honorable Judges
M. Bilal Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 PLP 227 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members M. Bilal Khan, J
Parties MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 227 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 227 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: M. Bilal Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 227 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Rana Javed Anwar Khan for Petitioner (in Criminal Miscellaneous No.7374/B of 2005).
  • Muhammad Ramzan Watto for Petitioner (in Criminal Miscellaneous No.7642/B of 2005).

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 324, 337-A(i) & (ii), 148 & 149

Bail, refusal of-Accused had been nominated in F.I.R. with a specific role of causing fire-arm injury on the person of deceased which proved fatal

Contention of accused that some other person had killed the deceased and not he, did not carry any weight in presence of statements of injured prosecution witnesses recorded under S.161, Cr.P.C. wherein they resolutely struck to their stance as contained in F.I.R.

Prima facie ample incriminating material was available on record connecting accused with the crime imputed to him

No merit having been found in bail petition of accused, same was dismissed.

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 337-A(i)

Bail, grant of

Co accused had been assigned the role of .firstly catching hold of complainant by his collar and then causing a blow with the butt of his .32-bore revolver on the back of his head

Other allegation against said co-accused was that he had been raising Lalkaras

Injury attributed to co-accused recorded in medico-legal report had been declared to be falling within the purview of S.337-A(i), P.P.C., which did not attract prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.

Said co-accused was in custody for the last more than ten months and trial had not concluded

Vicarious liability of the co-accused needed to be thrashed out during the course of trial

Co-accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. M. A. Ghaffar ul Haq for the Complainant. M. Saleem Shad for the State.

Judgment & Decree

M. BILAL KHAN, J.--Muhammad Jahangir son of Mushtaq Ahmed and Abdul Rehman son of Din Muhammad, the petitioners by filing Criminal Miscellaneous Nos.7374/B and 7642/B of 2005, respectively seek post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.139 dated 23-3-2005, registered at Police Station Saddar Pakpattan Sharif for offences under sections 302, 324, 337-A(i), 337-A(ii), 148 and, 149 read with section 109, P.P.C., at the instance of Muhammad Akram son of Bashir Ahmed, paternal cousin of Khizar Hayat deceased. I propose to dispose of both these matters together through this single order.

2. Since the facts of the case have already been given in detail in my order of even dated passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.6802/CB of 2005, whereby pre-arrest bail granted to Abdul Majeed and Asadullah, co-accused of the petitioners, has been cancelled, therefore, the same need not be reiterated here once again.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at considerable length and have also gone through the record brought by Muhammad Hassan S.-I.

4. Insofar as the allegation against Muhammad Jahangir (petitioner) is concerned, he has been nominated in the F.I.R. with a specific role of causing fire-arm injury on the person of Khizar Hayat, which proved fatal. The contention of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf that some other person had killed Khizar Hayat and not Muhammad Jahangir (petitioner), does not carry any weight in the presence A of the statements of the injured P.Ws. recorded under section 161, Cr.P.C. wherein they resolutely stick to their stance as contained in the F.I.R. prima facie, there is ample incriminating material available on the record connecting him with the crime imputed to him. Accordingly, there being no merit in the bail petition bearing Criminal Miscellaneous No.7374/B of 2005, the same is dismissed.

5. As regards Abdul Rehman (petitioner), he has been assigned the role of firstly catching hold of the complainant by his collar and then causing a blow with the butt of his .32 bore revolver on the back of his head. The other allegation against him was that he had been raising Lalkaras that no Gujjar may be allowed to escape from the scene. Thus it would be seen that the injury attributed to Abdul Rehman petitioner was Injury No.2 recorded in the medico-legal report of Muhammad Akram (the complainant), which had been "declared to be falling within the purview of section 337-A(i), P.P.C. and it does not attract the prohibitory clause of section 497(i), Cr.P.C. He is in custody for the last more than ten months and the trial has yet not concluded. His vicarious liability needs to B be thrashed out during the course of trial.

6. Resultantly, bail application bearing Criminal Misc. No.7642/B of 2005 is allowed and Abdul Rehman (petitioner) is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M-547/L Order accordingly.