2003 PLP 2298 (YLR)
MAQBOOL AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2003 PLP 2298 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | MAQBOOL AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 2298 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 2298 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 2298 (YLR) (MAQBOOL AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Azam Nazir Tarar for Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
S.497(2)
Accused was immediately got medically examined by Police after occurrence and 25 injuries were found on his person
Three injuries were with sharp edged weapon while rest were with blunt weapon
According to Medico-Legal Report duration was also fresh one, but said injuries were suppressed by prosecution
Ordinarily when trial started, bail was not granted, but according to S.497, Cr.P.C. bail could be granted to an accused if his case was covered under S. 497(2), Cr. P. C.
Case of accused being of further inquiry, accused was admitted to bail. PLD 1989 SC 584 and 2000 PCr.LJ 845 ref. Mustafa Kamal for the State.
Judgment & Decree
PLD 1989 SC 584 and 2000 PCr.LJ 845 ref. Azam Nazir Tarar for Petitioner Mustafa Kamal for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of this petition submits that there are 25 injuries on the person of present petitioner with sharp-edged weapon and blunt-edged weapon respectively which have been suppressed by the complainant. Learned counsel submits that though the trial has started but during trial if case of an accused is covered by subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. the Court can allow bail to him. In this regard he has relied upon PLD 1989 SC 584 and 2000 PCr.LJ
845. Learned counsel submits that there is no bar for grant of bail, even trial has started. He submits that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.
2. On the other hand learned State Counsel submits that petitioner not only gave Sota blow to the deceased but also injured three P. Ws. He submits that case of the petitioner is covered by the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parries. Certified copy of Medico-legal Report of Maqbool Ahmad petitioner has been placed on record. The occurrence had taken place on 17-3-2002 at 5-00 p.m., petitioner was got medically examined by the police itself on the same day at 6-30 p.m, There are 25 injuries on the person of present petitioner. Injuries Nos.2, 3 and 5 are with sharp-edged weapon while the rest are with blunt-edged weapon. The petitioner was examined by the Doctor immediately after the occurrence and according to the Medico- Legal Report the duration was also fresh one but the injuries were suppressed by the prosecution. It is correct that ordinarily when the trial starts bail is not granted but according to section 497, Cr.P.C. bail can be granted to an accused person if his case is covered under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. i.e. of further inquiry. Learned counsel for the petitioner has rightly relied upon the above said judgments.
4. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry so while accepting this petition petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like, amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. I may also state here that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date of hearing fixed by the Court. He will ensure the availability of his counsel also. In case he intentionally does not appear before the trial Court or does not produce his counsel then learned trial Court would be at liberty to cancel his bail granted by this Court. H.B.T./M-1730/L Bail granted.