PCRLJ 2014

2014 P Cr (PLP)

ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Peshawar
Decided Date
2013-April-8
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2014 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Peshawar
Bench Members N/A
Parties ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2014 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2014 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2014 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Noor Alam Khan for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Ss.9(c) & 51(1)

Possession of narcotic

Bail, refusal of

Narcotic hidden in a vehicle

Packets of charas weighing 14 kilograms in total were allegedly recovered by the police from beneath the front seat of the driver, and from beneath the front and rear seats of the vehicle

Accused was driving the vehicle in question at the relevant time

Quantity of charas recovered was huge (i.e. 14 kilograms)

Case of prosecution was duly supported by statements of police officials, who were eye-witnesses of the occurrence and had no mala fide or ill-will to implicate the accused

Report of Forensic Science Laboratory was in positive

Offence alleged entailed capital punishment and fell within the restrictive clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C., and also attracted the embargo contained in S. 51(1) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997

Bail petition of accused was dismissed in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

SHAH JEHAN KHAN AKHUNDZADA, J.

Abdul Hameed accused-petitioner facing prosecution in case F.I.R. No. 83 dated 13-2-2013 under section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 at Police Station, registered at Police Station, Akora Khattak, Nowshera was refused bail by the learned Sessions Judge/JFC, Nowshera vide his order dated 2-3-2013. He has now moved this Court for his release on bail.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 13-2-2013 at 1700 hours Inayatur Rehman ASI along with his police contingents was on mobile gasht of the Illaqa when he received information that contraband Charas would be smuggled from tribal territory towards Punjab through Motor Car bearing Registration No.UR-012, so he had laid picket at the spot, meanwhile the said vehicle came there which was signalled to stop but instead of stopping the car, the driver accelerated its speed. However, the same was chased and was forced to stop near Akora Pathak. On apprehension of the driver, he disclosed his name as Abdul Hameed son of Abdur Razzaq resident of Turangzai Charsadda and the other person sitting in the front seat disclosed his name as Muhammad Qaiser son of Ghulam Nabi resident of Abbottabad Ayub Medical Complex Colony. On search of the car, the police recovered five packets of Charas from beneath the seat of the driver, five packets from beneath the front seat and four packets of Charas from beneath the rear seat (total 14 Kilograms). Out of the total quantity, 5/5 grams from each packet were separated and sent to FSL for chemical analysis while the remaining Charas was sealed into separate parcels. Both the accused were arrested on the spot and Murasila for registration of a case was sent to Police Station, where the report, as mentioned above, was registered against him under section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned State counsel and have also gone through the record of the case.

4. Keeping in view the recovery of huge quantity of contraband Charas weighing fourteen (14) Kgs from the vehicle particularly when the accused-petitioner was driving the said vehicle at the relevant time and the fact that the case of the prosecution is duly supported by the statements of police officials who are eye-witnesses of this occurrence, having no mala fide or ill-will to implicate the accused-petitioner falsely coupled with positive report of FSL available on file, case of the accused-petitioner entailing capital punishment not only falls within the restrictive clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. but the same attracts the embargo contained in subsection (1) of section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, therefore, I do not feel inclined to release him on bail.

5. Resultantly, this bail petition being devoid of any merits is dismissed. MWA/335/P Bail refused.