YLR 2009

2009 PLP 13 (YLR)

AHMED alias AHMEDO and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.662 and M.As. Nos. 2782 and 2783 of 2008, decided on 24th October, 2008.
Honorable Judges
Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP 13 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J
Parties AHMED alias AHMEDO and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 13 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 13 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 13 (YLR) (AHMED alias AHMEDO and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Agha Ather Hussain, Asst. Advocate-General Sindh.
  • On the other hand Mr. Agha Ather Hussain, Assistant Advocate-General appearing on behalf of the State, has opposed to the grant of bail on the ground that Applicants are named in the F.I.R. with a specific role and that still the Baby Moomal has not been recovered, therefore this is not a fit case for grant of bail.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.363, 452, 343, 165 & 364-A

Bail, grant of, further inquiry

Contents of F.I.R., showed that enmity existed between the parties

Accused were in jail for the last more than one year

After completion of investigation a challan had already been submitted in the case

Continued custody of accused persons in jail, was not likely to serve any beneficial purpose at such a stage

Case against accused persons calling for further inquiry into their guilt within the purview of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P. C., they were admitted to bail. Zulifquar Ali Jatoi for Applicants. Agha Ather Hussain, Asst. Advocate-General Sindh.

Judgment & Decree

FARRUKH ZIA G. SHAIKH, J.

Applicants Ahmed alias Ahmedo and Ghulam Shabir both by caste Gopang have filed this application under section 497, Cr.P.C. seeking bail, who are required in F.I.R. Crime No.90 of 2007 registered at Police Station, Mehrabpur, District Naushahro Feroze, for an offence under sections 363, 452, 343, 165 & 364-A, P.P.C. In a nut-shell, prosecution story is that the case was initiated on an F.I.R. lodged by Complainant Mst. Hayat Khatoon wife of Abdul Hadi by caste Mari on 14-9-2007 alleging therein that prior to the marriage of Complainant with Abdul Hadi, who has already two wives and on her marriage her father was annoyed with her husband. Her husband has two sons and three daughters from his first wife. On 12-6-2007 leaving behind two daughters namely Baby Moomal aged about 7 years and Baby Zakia in the house, she along with her husband Abdul Hadi and his second wife Mst. Arbab Zadi left for Kamaldero to take medicine from Hospital as Complainant had stomach problem and when at about 4 p.m. they returned to their house and found missing Baby Moomal in the house. Baby Zakia informed them that about noon time, Qurban Ali, Ghulam Shabir, Piral, Ahmed alias Ahmedo have taken away Baby Moomal with them and then Qurban Ali contacted on telephone that they have abducted Baby Moomal and demanded Rs.100,000 for her return. Mr. Zulifquar Ali Jatoi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Applicants has argued that the Applicants are respectable and innocent persons and have been entangled in this case due to enmity over the matrimonial affairs. He has also argued that there is a delay of three days in lodging the F.I.R. while distance of Police Station from the place of wardhat is only 7/8 Kilometers, which has not .been explained properly. He has further argued that the incident has taken place on 12-6-2007 and after registration of F.I.R. on 14-9-2007, the Complainant party has remained silent as no efforts are made for the recovery of Baby Moomal. He has also further argued that it is unbelievable that Zakia identified the applicants though they are resident of Nawabshah. In the last he has argued that the Applicants are in Jail since last more than one year and have been punished sufficiently in this false case, investigation has been completed and a challan has been submitted in this case and requested for grant of bail, as their case does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.0 calling further enquiry. On the other hand Mr. Agha Ather Hussain, Assistant Advocate-General appearing on behalf of the State, has opposed to the grant of bail on the ground that Applicants are named in the F.I.R. with a specific role and that still the Baby Moomal has not been recovered, therefore this is not a fit case for grant of bail. According to the contents of F.I.R. there is enmity between the parties. The applicants are in Jail since last more than one year. After completion of the investigation a challan has already been submitted in this case and, thus continued custody of the Applicants in Jail is not likely to serve any beneficial purpose at such a stage. For what has been discussed above the case against both the present applicants calls for further inquiry into their guilt within the purview of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. This application is, therefore, allowed and the applicants are admitted to bail subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs. 100,000 (Rs. one lac) only each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Application stands disposed of in the above terms along with all listed applications. H.B.T./A-153/K Bail granted.