1994 P Cr (PLP)
SADORO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SADORO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (SADORO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S324
Injured was the wife of the accused and the injuries sustained by her were not grievous in nature
Prosecution did not oppose the bail application
Judgment & Decree
Jai Jai Veshno Manga Ram for Applicant. Wakeel Ahmed Qureshi for A.-G., Sindh for the State. Applicant Sadoro has moved for bail in F.I.R. No.106/92 of Police Station Khanpur. It is alleged that he alongwith co-accused Hidayatullah and Imdadullah came in house of complainant Darya Khan to commit murder of Mst. Azizan. Sadoro had a knife while the co-accused had hatchets. Mst. Azizan escaped but she received injuries at hands of the applicant. Such F.LR. was lodged by Darya Khan. Motive for the offence was that applicant Sadoro wanted release of his wife Mst. Azizan who was detained by her uncle complainant Darya Khan. Mr. Jai Jai Veshno, learned counsel for the applicant argued that the F.I.R. was delayed by 16 hours when the distance between the Police Station Khanpur and the place of incident was 10 KM. and that there were contradictions between the medical evidence and the ocular evidence and that injured Mst. Azizan was produced before Medical Officer 18 hours after the incident and that the Medical Officer determined the injuries on person of Mst. Aziz to be simple in nautre. It was added that a false case concocted between the parties. Learned counsel conceded existence of dispute between the parties but contended that the applicant had no necessity of going to house of the complainant in company of the co-accused for the purpose of causing injuries to Mst. Azizan, whose return he wanted. Mr. Wakeel Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the A.-G. Sindh did not oppose the application after arguing that injuries were caused to Mst. Azizan on sensitive part of her body. The medical certificate shows that Mst. Azizan received one incised wound measuring 5 c.m. x 1 c.m. x skin deep towards right side lateral to side the vagina and a lacerated wound at ulna with haematoma. Both the injuries were determined to be simple in nature. The incised wound was caused by means of a sharp-cutting weapon while the other injury was caused by blunt substance as per medical certificate dated 29-12-1992. Injured Mst. Azizan is wife of applicant Sadoro. The injuries sustained by her are not grievous in nature. The State does not oppose. Applicant Sadoro is, therefore, granted bail and he be released if he furnishes two sureties in sum of Rs.50,000 each with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Shikarpur. N.H.Q./S-1016/K Bail allowed.