1990 PLP 679 (SCMR)
SAJJAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus MAHMUD HUSSAIN and 23 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 679 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and S. Usman Ali Shall, JJ |
| Parties | SAJJAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus MAHMUD HUSSAIN and 23 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 679 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 679 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and S. Usman Ali Shall, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 679 (SCMR) (SAJJAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus MAHMUD HUSSAIN and 23 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Ata‑ur‑Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 13th June, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 21‑5‑1985, of the Lahore High Court, in R.S. A. No.462 of 1906). ‑‑‑O.VII, R.11‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Rejection of plaint in a suit for possession on ground of deficiency in court‑fee‑‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine the pleas raised as also effect of judgment of Siddique Khan and 2 others v. Abdul Shakur Khan and another P L D 1984 S C 289.
Judgment & Decree
Mian Ata‑ur‑Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 13th June, 1989. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought; against the dismissal by the High Court, of a Regular Second Appeal filed by the plaintiff/petitioner. It had arisen out of the rejection of the plaint in his suit for possession on account of deficiency in court‑fee. Learned counsel has relied on Siddique Khan and 2 others v. Abdul Shakur Khan and another (P L D 1984 S C 289) which supports him. Leave to appeal is accordingly granted to examine the pleas raised in this case as also the effect of said judgment in the case of Siddique Khan. Security Rs.5,
000. The appeal shall be prepared on present record with direction to the parties to file all essential documents. M.A.K./S‑450/S Leave granted.