1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
LATIF-UR-REHMAN Versus THE SECRETARY, EDUCATON, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | LATIF-UR-REHMAN Versus THE SECRETARY, EDUCATON, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (LATIF-UR-REHMAN Versus THE SECRETARY, EDUCATON, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Latif Khalid for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 27th November, 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
Civil servant was granted leave for about 7 months on half pay and extraordinary leave for 2-1/2 months as required by civil servant was granted without pay
Civil servant after availing leave, remained absent for a long period of about 8 years unauthorisedly
Extraordinary leave without pay could be granted to civil servant upto a maximum period of five years under the relevant Leave Rules
Total period of leave, where it was granted in continuation of any other kind of leave was not to exceed five years
Thus after deducting leave sanctioned in favour of civil servant on half average pay, he could not have been granted extraordinary leave for more than prescribed period
Civil servant who deliberately remained absent without authority, was rightly removed from service.
Judgment & Decree
THE SECRETARY, EDUCATON, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another Appeal No. 120/89, decided on 6th January, 1991.
Civil servant was granted leave for about 7 months on half pay and extraordinary leave for 2-1/2 months as required by civil servant was granted without pay
Civil servant after availing leave, remained absent for a long period of about 8 years unauthorisedly
Extraordinary leave without pay could be granted to civil servant upto a maximum period of five years under the relevant Leave Rules
Total period of leave, where it was granted in continuation of any other kind of leave was not to exceed five years
Thus after deducting leave sanctioned in favour of civil servant on half average pay, he could not have been granted extraordinary leave for more than prescribed period
Civil servant who deliberately remained absent without authority, was rightly removed from service. Muhammad Latif Khalid for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 27th November, 1990.