1987 P Cr (PLP)
SAJJAD and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mazhar‑ul‑Haq, J |
| Parties | SAJJAD and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mazhar‑ul‑Haq, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (SAJJAD and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Muhammad Jamil Akhtar for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Petitioners allegedly living in adultery but husband not complainant against them‑‑Petitioners also claiming to have lawfully married each other and the woman already having filed a suit for jactitation of her marriage which too pending decision‑ Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. Malik Rehmat Khan Awan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 670/B of 1987, decided on 28th March, 1987. ‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Petitioners allegedly living in adultery but husband not complainant against them‑‑Petitioners also claiming to have lawfully married each other and the woman already having filed a suit for jactitation of her marriage which too pending decision‑ Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. Mian Muhammad Jamil Akhtar for Petitioners. Malik Rehmat Khan Awan for the State. Sajjad and Mst. Maqsooda petitioners are accused of the offences under section 10/16 of the Hudood Ordinance. Case was registered against them on 15‑1‑1987 at Police Station, Sillanwali.
2. Ehsanullah, stepbrother of Mst. Maqsoodan made a report to the police that the two are living in adultery because Mst. Maqsoodan was previously married to one Ashiq. Petitioners claim to have lawfully married each other. Mst. Maqsoodan has filed a suit for the jactitation of his marriage which is also pending. The husband is not the complainant in this case. Under the circumstances the petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs.5,000 (five thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sargodha, pending trial. S.G.D./S‑37/L Bail granted.