1990 PLP 442 (SCMR)
Mrs. AQEELA ASGHAR ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus Miss; KHALIDA KHATOON MALIK and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 442 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | Mrs. AQEELA ASGHAR ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus Miss; KHALIDA KHATOON MALIK and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Service Tribunals Act (VIII of 1974)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 442 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (VIII of 1974)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 442 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 442 (SCMR) (Mrs. AQEELA ASGHAR ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus Miss; KHALIDA KHATOON MALIK and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S. M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner (in C. Ps. Nos.904 and 905 of 1988).
- Muhammad Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General for Petitioner (in C.Ps. Nos. 946 and 922 of 1988).
- Muhammad Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General for Respondents (in C.Ps. Nos. 904 and 905 of 1988).
- Date of hearing: 21st May, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 16‑5‑1988 in Appeals Nos.753 & 754/87). ‑‑‑S.4‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑Neither private parties nor the Government were satisfied from the judgment of Service Tribunal‑‑Important question of law of public importance was involved, which needed detailed examination and called for authoritative pronouncement‑‑Leave to appeal granted.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General for Petitioner (in C.Ps. Nos. 946 and 922 of 1988). Muhammad Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General for Respondents (in C.Ps. Nos. 904 and 905 of 1988). Date of hearing: 21st May, 1989. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑The judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal has been assailed by means of four separate petitions for special leave to appeal. Neither the private parties nor the Government are satisfied. We think the matter needs detailed examination because an important question of law of public importance is involved in these petitions which calls for an authoritative pronouncement by this Court. Accordingly we grant leave to appeal in all the four petitions. Security Rs.5,000 each in C.P.Nos.904 and 905 of 1988. Appeals to be made ready on the present record. The parties if they so wish may file additional documents within two months: Interim order dated 10‑5‑1989 shall continue, M.A.K./A‑596/S Leave granted.