1990 PLP 399 (SCMR)
Mst. SUGHRAN BIBI and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB,
| Citation | 1990 PLP 399 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. SUGHRAN BIBI and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 399 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 399 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 399 (SCMR) (Mst. SUGHRAN BIBI and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Shahid Hussain Kadri, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Aslam Choudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th August, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 13 January, 1987 in Writ Petition No.2715 of 1986). Consolidation of holdings‑‑‑ ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.185(3) & 199‑‑‑Petitioner was unable to controvert the fact that he had obtained more area in class III land than his previous holding and also that there was no reduction if the calculation was made by classification of land‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed as no interference was called for in findings of fact by High Court.
Judgment & Decree
Consolidation of holdings‑‑‑ ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.185(3) & 199‑‑‑Petitioner was unable to controvert the fact that he had obtained more area in class III land than his previous holding and also that there was no reduction if the calculation was made by classification of land‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed as no interference was called for in findings of fact by High Court. Shahid Hussain Kadri, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Aslam Choudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 30th August, 1989. JAVID IQBAL, J.‑‑This petition for leave to appeal is directed against order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 13 January, 1987 whereby writ petition of the petitioners was dismissed. The dispute pertains to consolidation a holding of village Mundranwala Tehsil Daska District Sialkot. The consolidation scheme was confirmed in 1966 but the petitioners litigated the matter on the ground that their entitlement was reduced. They went up to the Member, Board of Revenue but their revision was dismissed for the reason that the scheme was confirmed pursuant to the consent in writing given by the petitioners on 29 October, 1966. After having lost in the Revenue Courts the petitioners filed writ petition which was also dismissed for the reason that counsel for the petitioners was unable to controvert the fact that they had obtained more area in class III land than their previous holding and also that there was no reduction if the calculation was made by classification of land. These findings of fact call for no interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. M.BA./S‑460/S Petition dismissed.