1976 PLP 74 (SCMR)
HUSSAIN KARIM‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS CRESCENT PAK INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondents
| Citation | 1976 PLP 74 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Hamoodur Rahman, C. J., Muhammad Yaqub Ali and |
| Parties | HUSSAIN KARIM‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS CRESCENT PAK INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLP 74 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLP 74 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Hamoodur Rahman, C. J., Muhammad Yaqub Ali and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLP 74 (SCMR) (HUSSAIN KARIM‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS CRESCENT PAK INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ali Akbar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 24th October 1975.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Sind & Baluchistan High Court, Karachi, dated 14‑4‑1975, in Constitution Petition No. 861 of 1974). West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) ‑ ‑‑‑ S. O. 18‑Employee not giving notice to Employer before invoking jurisdiction of Labour Court‑‑Employee's petition, held, rightly dismissed by Labour Court and High Court. Saleemsons Ltd. v. 2nd Sind Labour Court P L D 1973 Kar. 1 ref.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑ S. O. 18‑Employee not giving notice to Employer before invoking jurisdiction of Labour Court‑‑Employee's petition, held, rightly dismissed by Labour Court and High Court. Saleemsons Ltd. v. 2nd Sind Labour Court P L D 1973 Kar. 1 ref. Ali Akbar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing : 24th October 1975. MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑On hearing the learned counsel for the ,petitioner, we find no proper ground to grant leave to appeal. The petitioner admittedly did not give notice to the employer before invoking the jurisdiction of the Labour Court. This was in contravention of the provisions of Standing Order No.
18. The High Court has relied on Saleemsons Ltd. v. 2nd Sind Labour Court (P L D 1973 Kar. 1) and dismissed the writ petition with the observation that "the order passed by the Labour Court in the present case is covered by law and authority." It is not shown that the vie taken by the Labour Court is not covered by law and authority. In the circumstances, the writ petition filed by the petitioner to challenge the order of the Court as without lawful authority was rightly dismissed. Leave to appeal is refused and the petition dismissed. Petition dismissed.