1984 P Cr (PLP)
Master YOUSUF MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1984 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Javed Iqbal, C.J. |
| Parties | Master YOUSUF MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Javed Iqbal, C.J..
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 P Cr (PLP) (Master YOUSUF MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mahfuz-ul-Haq Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497 read with Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (V11 of 1979), S.10-- Bail, grant of-- Litigation for judicial separation going on between petitioner and her husband and relations between them already, strained-- Complainant party also failed to establish adultery on part of petitioner in civil proceedings--Case for grant of bail of both petitioners, held, made out-- Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. Umar Hayat Chauhan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2313-B of 1983, decided on 27th September 1983.
S.497 read with Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (V11 of 1979), S.10-- Bail, grant of-- Litigation for judicial separation going on between petitioner and her husband and relations between them already, strained-- Complainant party also failed to establish adultery on part of petitioner in civil proceedings--Case for grant of bail of both petitioners, held, made out-- Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. Mahfuz-ul-Haq Khan for Petitioner. Umar Hayat Chauhan for the State. In continuation of my order, dated 12-9-1983 the police record indicates that previously the present complainant through her son had started civil litigation for judicial separation against Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner. This civil litigation was decided on .26-2-1983. An issue had been framed in the said litigation to the effect that as to whether or not Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner had committed adultery. The finding of the Court was that the issue could not be proved as against Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner. Learned counsel has vehemently argued that since the complainant side did not succeed in establishing' adultery as against Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner in the civil proceedings they have now falsely implicated her in criminal proceedings for having committed Zina with Master Yousaf Masih petitioner. It appears that the litigation is going on between Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner and her husband and the relations between them are strained. The complainant in this case is the mother-in-law of Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner. Master Yousaf Masih petitioner is stated to be the person with whom Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner is residing. This allegation is being levelled in the background of strained relations and litigation between the husband and Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner and the background of this litigation had shown at least on the civil side A that the complainant party could not establish adultery on the part of Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner. Since this is the background, in my view a case is made out for the grant of bail to Mst. Margret Nazli petitioner as well as Master Yousaf petitioner. It is ordered accordingly. Both the aforesaid petitioners are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 5,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Sheikhupura. This petition stands disposed of. S. G. D. Bail admitted.