2003 PLP 3094 (YLR)
Messrs A & B FOOD INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2003 PLP 3094 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | S.A. Sarwana and Anwar Zaheer Jamali, JJ |
| Parties | Messrs A & B FOOD INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 3094 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 3094 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: S.A. Sarwana and Anwar Zaheer Jamali, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 3094 (YLR) (Messrs A & B FOOD INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ms. Sonia holding brief for Muhammad Farid for Petitioner.
- Shakeel Ahmed for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
‑-‑‑Art 199(4‑A)‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑ Application for vacation of stay‑‑‑Stay granted was sought to be vacated on ground that more than six months had expired since its grant‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Held, it was not necessary to pass a formal order for vacating stay order because under Art. 199(4‑A) of the Constitution stay order granted by Court would cease to have effect on expiry of a period of six months following the date on which it was made. Zahoor Textile Mills Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1999 SC 880 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Constitutional Petition No.D‑2886 of 1993, decided on 14th March, 2001. ‑-‑‑Art 199(4‑A)‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑ Application for vacation of stay‑‑‑Stay granted was sought to be vacated on ground that more than six months had expired since its grant‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Held, it was not necessary to pass a formal order for vacating stay order because under Art. 199(4‑A) of the Constitution stay order granted by Court would cease to have effect on expiry of a period of six months following the date on which it was made. Zahoor Textile Mills Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1999 SC 880 ref. Ms. Sonia holding brief for Muhammad Farid for Petitioner. Shakeel Ahmed for Respondent. Ms. Sonia requests for adjournment on the ground that Mr. Farid has been admitted in NICVD for treatment of his heart ailment. Today the matter is fixed for hearing of respondent's application under Article 199 4(A) requesting the Court to vacate the order dated 27‑10‑1993 as more than six months have expired since the grant of stay. It is not necessary to pass a formal order for vacating the stay as the provisions of Article 199 (4‑A) of the Constitution are clear which legal position has also been clarified by the Supreme Court in the case of Zahoor Textile A Mills Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1999 SC 880, that any stay order granted by the Court shall cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of six months following the date on which it is made. Consequently, the stay granted on 27‑10‑1993 stands vacated. H.B.T./A‑470/K Stay order vacated.