1995 PLP 1236 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD KHALID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL KAREEM‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1995 PLP 1236 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ahmad Saeed Awan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD KHALID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL KAREEM‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 1236 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 1236 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ahmad Saeed Awan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 1236 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD KHALID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL KAREEM‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ali Baqir Najfi for Petitioners.
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Khan for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 491‑‑‑Habeas corpus petition ‑‑‑Detenus had been recovered from the custody of their mother whose custody could not be termed to be illegal‑‑ Detenus had categorically stated that they wanted to live with their mother‑‑Detenus were allowed to go with her‑‑‑Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Ali Baqir Najfi for Petitioners. Rana Maqbool Ahmad Khan for Respondent. The alleged detenus have been produced before this Court. They have categorically stated that they want to live with their mother. Allowed to go with A the mother.
2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 14‑3‑1995 I have warned the learned counsel to satisfy himself about the story put in the petition. He vehemently contended that he had satisfied. himself and there is nothing to tell a lie.
3. The alleged detenus have been recovered from the custody of their mother whose custody cannot be termed to be illegal. The statements of alleged detenus run contrary to the stand taken by the petitioner. It may be observed that this Court is under Constitutional and legal duty to protect honour, life and liberty of the citizens. It cannot be imagined that what insult a family faces when a bailiff raids at their house. Such a tendency must be curbed with an iron hand. I have, therefore, no option but to issue notice to Mr. Ali Baqir Najfi, Advocate, 6‑Turner Road, Lahore to explain his position.
4. To come up on 3‑4‑1995. N.H.Q./M‑2037/L Order accordingly.