1986 PLP 1670 (SCMR)
USMA NASSER and 4 others — Petitioners Versus ZAITOON KHATOON — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1670 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | USMA NASSER and 4 others — Petitioners Versus ZAITOON KHATOON — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1670 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1670 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1670 (SCMR) (USMA NASSER and 4 others — Petitioners Versus ZAITOON KHATOON — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Athar Saeed, Advocate Supreme Court and Hafiz Abdul Baqi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 21st January, 1986.
- Athar Saeed, Advocate Supreme Court and Hafiz Abdul Baqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from judgment and order of Sind High Court Karachi, dated 10-9-1985 in F.R.A. No. 380 of 1982).
Art. 185(3)--Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.21- Eviction--Default in payment of rent--Courts below arriving on concurrent findings that tenants were defaulters in payment of rent as alleged by landlord--Findings of Courts below being unexceptionable, leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.21‑ Eviction‑‑Default in payment of rent‑‑Courts below arriving on concurrent findings that tenants were defaulters in payment of rent as alleged by landlord‑‑Findings of Courts below being unexceptionable, leave to appeal refused. Athar Saeed, Advocate Supreme Court and Hafiz Abdul Baqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 21st January, 1986. ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of a learned Judge of Sind High Court, dated 10‑9‑1985 dismissing petitioner's appeal and thereby upholding order of the Rent Controller by which he was directed to handover vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent‑landlord. Learned Rent Controller passed that order on being satisfied from the evidence recorded in the case that the petitioners were defaulter in payment of rent. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner we find that no exception in law can be taken against the concurrent findings of the two Courts that the petitioners were defaulter in payment of rent as alleged by the respondent‑landlord. This petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.