1985 PLP 1800 (SCMR)
of the Punjab Food Department, Lahore Petitioner Versus Malik MUHAMMAD JALIL — Respondent
| Citation | 1985 PLP 1800 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ |
| Parties | of the Punjab Food Department, Lahore Petitioner Versus Malik MUHAMMAD JALIL — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 1800 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 1800 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 1800 (SCMR) (of the Punjab Food Department, Lahore Petitioner Versus Malik MUHAMMAD JALIL — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 7th May, 1985.
- M.M. Saeed Beg, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record Respondent in person.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 3-12-1980 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No. 1934 of 1980).
Art. 185(3)--Leave to appeal, grant of--Petitioner unable to show any law or principle of general importance having been violated by Courts below--Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. M.M. Saeed Beg, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record Respondent in person.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 3‑12‑1980 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No. 1934 of 1980). ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑Petitioner unable to show any law or principle of general importance having been violated by Courts below‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. M.M. Saeed Beg, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record Respondent in person. Date of hearing: 7th May, 1985. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑The suit filed by the respondent for a declaration that the termination of his service was illegal, ultra vires and of no legal effect was decreed to the extent that the order, dated 3‑12‑1966 was held as void and of no legal effect. The petitioner Government challenged this order by filing an appeal before the Additional District Judge which was dismissed by him vide order, dated 27‑4‑1980 and the revision filed to challenge the said order in the High Court also failed. Hence this petition for leave to appeal in this Court. We have heard Mr. M.M. Saeed Beg in support of this petition. He has not been able to show that any law or principle of general importance has been violated by the Courts below. Hence there is not force in this petition which is accordingly dismissed hereby. M.I. Petition dismissed.