2003 SCMR 285 (PLP)
KHALID MEHMOOD RAJA ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, PAKISTAN RANGERS (SINDH) and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2003 SCMR 285 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Qazi Muhammad Farooq, Rana Bhagwandas and |
| Parties | KHALID MEHMOOD RAJA ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, PAKISTAN RANGERS (SINDH) and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 SCMR 285 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 SCMR 285 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Qazi Muhammad Farooq, Rana Bhagwandas and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 SCMR 285 (PLP) (KHALID MEHMOOD RAJA ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, PAKISTAN RANGERS (SINDH) and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 17th September, 2002.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 8‑10‑2001 of the Federal Service Tribunal, passed in Appeal No.761(R)(CS) of 2000). ‑‑‑‑S.4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑‑Appeal before Service Tribunal‑‑‑Case remanded ‑‑‑Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal of civil servant for the reason that in earlier judgment passed by Supreme Cot‑it, no direction was given that the civil servant would be entitled to file appeal in case any order adverse to the civil servant was passed‑‑ Respondents/authorities consented for remand of appeal to Service Tribunal for decision afresh‑‑‑By consent of the parties, the petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and judgment passed by Service Tribunal was set aside‑‑‑Case was remanded to Service Tribunal for decision afresh on merits‑‑‑Appeal was allowed. Petitioner in person. Hafiz S.A. Rehman, Deputy Attorney‑General for Pakistan.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment dated 8‑10‑2001 of the Federal Service Tribunal, passed in Appeal No.761(R)(CS) of 2000). ‑‑‑‑S.4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑‑Appeal before Service Tribunal‑‑‑Case remanded ‑‑‑Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal of civil servant for the reason that in earlier judgment passed by Supreme Cot‑it, no direction was given that the civil servant would be entitled to file appeal in case any order adverse to the civil servant was passed‑‑ Respondents/authorities consented for remand of appeal to Service Tribunal for decision afresh‑‑‑By consent of the parties, the petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and judgment passed by Service Tribunal was set aside‑‑‑Case was remanded to Service Tribunal for decision afresh on merits‑‑‑Appeal was allowed. Petitioner in person. Hafiz S.A. Rehman, Deputy Attorney‑General for Pakistan. Date of hearing: 17th September, 2002. QAZI MUHAMMAD FAROOQ, J.‑‑‑This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated 8‑10‑2001 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal, whereby the petitioner's appeal was dismissed with the following observations:‑‑ "The appellant submits that he has preferred departmental appeal and has the right to file this appeal. The departmental representative of the respondents states that the matter has been clinched by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan by referring the above mentioned A judgment. The august Supreme Court of Pakistan in the abovementioned judgment has not directed that the appellant will be entitled to file appeal in case any order adverse to the appellant is passed."
2. The petitioner's appeal was indubitably guillotined by the Tribunal and for that very reason the learned Deputy Attorney‑General took the stance that the ‑request made by the petitioner for remand of the case to the Tribunal may be granted. Accordingly, by consent third petition is converted into appeal and by allowing the same the impugned judgment is set aside and the case is remanded to the Tribunal for decision afresh on merits, within a period of four months. Q. M. H. /M. A. K./K‑71/S Case remanded.