PCRLJ 1989

1989 P Cr (PLP)

MEHRAJ DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and another‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Revision No. 386 of 1988, decided on 31st August, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Ijaz Nisar, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ijaz Nisar, J
Parties MEHRAJ DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and another‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (MEHRAJ DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Ch. Muhammad Yaqub Sindhu for Petitioner.
  • Muhammad Aslam Sindhu for Respondent No. l.
  • Date of hearing: 31st August, 1988.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.148 & 307/149‑‑Accused, a desperate person, involved in several criminal cases‑‑Besides twelve cases registered prior to the present case two cases of murderous assault were registered against accused after the present occurrence and his release on bail by Magistrate which was cancelled by Additional Sessions Judge‑‑In one of the cases legs of relations of injured prosecution witnesses were cut while in other case brother of that witness was given fire‑arm injuries by the accused and others‑‑Keeping in view nature of allegations, of having caused a fire‑arm injury on a vital part of the body and conduct of accused after his release on bail by the Magistrate, accused was not entitled to the grant of bail. Samiullah for the State.

Judgment & Decree

The facts giving rise to this petition are that case F.I.R. No. 231 of 1987 under sections 148, 307/149, P.P.C. was registered on the report of Mehraj Din petitioner against Zia Ullah etc. for launching murderous assault on him and others as a result of which his brother Shaukat and one Ashraf were injured. During investigation Muhammad Ashraf aforementioned stated that in fact Mehraj Din petitioner and his companions had formed an unlawful assembly and attacked him and that he was fired at by the petitioner with .12 bore gun hitting him near the right eye. Consequently Mehraj Din petitioner was arrested. He applied for bail which was granted by the Judicial Magistrate on 4‑10‑1987. Muhammad Ashraf moved an application against him for the cancellation of his bail which came up before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura who accepted the same and cancelled his bail on 17‑4‑1988. Hence this petition.

2. It is contended that Muhammad Ashraf son of Ibrahim had made a false statement before the police at the behest of the accused of case F.I.R. No. 231/87 got registered by Mehraj Din petitioner and that the injury found on his person was simple in nature. It is next submitted that the accused charged with murderously assaulting brother of the petitioner are on bail and being a case of two versions he is entitled to bail.

3. The learned Additional sessions Judge observed that the learned Magistrate had acted in haste in allowing bail to the petitioner just two days after his arrest and failed to consider that the injury attributed to him was on a vital part of the body.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. It has been brought to s my notice by the learned counsel for the complainant that the petitioner is a desperate person involved in several criminal cases. Besides twelve cases registered prior to the present case two cases of murderous assault were registered against him after the present occurrence and his release on bail. In one; of the cases the legs. of Liaquat, Budha and Aslam, relations of Ashraf son of Ibrahim injured, were cut while in 'other case Ilyas a brother of Ashraf was allegedly given fire‑arm injuries by the petitioner and others.

5. Keeping in view the nature of allegations against the petitioner of having caused fire‑arm injury on a vital part of the body of Ashraf son of Ibrahim and his conduct after having been released on bail by the Judicial Magistrate, I do not consider him entitled to the grant of bail and accordingly dismiss the application. MA.K./M‑1422/L Revision dismissed.