1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Syed MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN SHAH Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, AZAD JAMMU AND
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal And J&K |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Sajawal Khan, Chairman and Kh. Abdul Hamid Member |
| Parties | Syed MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN SHAH Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, AZAD JAMMU AND |
| Primary Law | Azad Jammu and Kashmir Police Rules |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Police Rules as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal And J&K bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Sajawal Khan, Chairman and Kh. Abdul Hamid Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Syed MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN SHAH Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, AZAD JAMMU AND). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Mustafa Mughal for Appellant.
- Raja Muhammad Hanif Khan for Respondents
Headnotes / Summary
R. 13.18
Probationary period of promotion
Order of reversion or reduction in rank after expiry of period of probation
Appointing Authority was debarred to pass order of reversion or reduction in rank after expiry of such period
Appellant having completed period of probation and having put in more service than probationary period, reversion in his rank was ordered in violation of Police Rules
Respondent Authority while making impugned order had referred to A.C.R. of appellant for specific year containing adverse report against him and some other punishments awarded to him without showing nature and date of such punishments
Where appellant had earned bad reports during probationary period, such reports should have been communicated to appellant well in time
Such reports were not conveyed to appellant during probationary period
Respondent Authority had powers to undo promotion of appellant before completion of probationary period but not after completion of such period
Order of reversion of appellant was thus, not valid and same deserved to be set aside.
Judgment & Decree
KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD and another Appeal No.512 of 1990, decided on 31st March, 1992. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Police Rules
R. 13.18
Probationary period of promotion
Order of reversion or reduction in rank after expiry of period of probation
Appointing Authority was debarred to pass order of reversion or reduction in rank after expiry of such period
Appellant having completed period of probation and having put in more service than probationary period, reversion in his rank was ordered in violation of Police Rules
Respondent Authority while making impugned order had referred to A.C.R. of appellant for specific year containing adverse report against him and some other punishments awarded to him without showing nature and date of such punishments
Where appellant had earned bad reports during probationary period, such reports should have been communicated to appellant well in time
Such reports were not conveyed to appellant during probationary period
Respondent Authority had powers to undo promotion of appellant before completion of probationary period but not after completion of such period
Order of reversion of appellant was thus, not valid and same deserved to be set aside. Ghulam Mustafa Mughal for Appellant. Raja Muhammad Hanif Khan for Respondents