2008 PLP 2432 (YLR)
BASHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus KHANU and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 PLP 2432 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Syed Jamshed Ali, J |
| Parties | BASHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus KHANU and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 2432 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 2432 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Syed Jamshed Ali, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 2432 (YLR) (BASHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus KHANU and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Art.204---Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976), Ss.3 & 4---Petition against contempt of court---Grievance of petitioner was that status quo order as to possession of property passed by High Court had been violated by the respondents---Counsel for respondents had brought to the notice of the court that petitioner was dispossessed through the process of execution of a decree passed in favour of respondent---High Court though had directed maintenance of status quo as to the possession of petitioner, but it was not intended to place any restraint on execution of some other decree---High Court declined to proceed further in contempt matter---Petitioner would be at liberty to take proceedings in the matter in accordance with law.
- Sheikh Naveed Shaharyar for Petitioner.
- Mian Altaf-ur-Rehman for Respondents Nos.1, 4 and 5.
- SYED JAMSHED ALI, J.----The grievance in this contempt petition was that the status quo order as to possession passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.8268 of 2000 has been violated by the respondents. The learned counsel for respondents 1, 4 and 5 has brought to my notice that the petitioner was dispossessed through the process of execution of a decree passed in favour of Khanu son of Jallo, respondent No.1, and possession was delivered to aforesaid Khanu on 23-5-2001 and relates to the property other than the property in dispute. Against the said order, Bashir Ahmad the petitioner and another filed an appeal before the learned District Court Mandi Baha-ud-Din on 25-6-2001, which according to him has been disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property involved is the same and the said appeal has been adjourned sine die. Although this Court directed maintenance of status quo as to possession of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 8268 of 2000, yet it was not intended to place any restraint on execution of some other decree. I am, therefore, not inclined to proceed further in the contempt matter. The petitioner will be at liberty to take proceedings in the matter in accordance with law. This contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Judgment & Decree
SYED JAMSHED ALI, J.
The grievance in this contempt petition was that the status quo order as to possession passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.8268 of 2000 has been violated by the respondents. The learned counsel for respondents 1, 4 and 5 has brought to my notice that the petitioner was dispossessed through the process of execution of a decree passed in favour of Khanu son of Jallo, respondent No.1, and possession was delivered to aforesaid Khanu on 23-5-2001 and relates to the property other than the property in dispute. Against the said order, Bashir Ahmad the petitioner and another filed an appeal before the learned District Court Mandi Baha-ud-Din on 25-6-2001, which according to him has been disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property involved is the same and the said appeal has been adjourned sine die. Although this Court directed maintenance of status quo as to possession of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 8268 of 2000, yet it was not intended to place any restraint on execution of some other decree. I am, therefore, not inclined to proceed further in the contempt matter. The petitioner will be at liberty to take proceedings in the matter in accordance with law. This contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of. H.B.T./B-35/L Order accordingly.