1994 PLP 342 (SCMR)
Miss SAJIDA PARVEEN and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PRINCIPAL, DEAN, KHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE, PESHAWAR
| Citation | 1994 PLP 342 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Saleem Akhtar, JJ |
| Parties | Miss SAJIDA PARVEEN and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PRINCIPAL, DEAN, KHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE, PESHAWAR |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 342 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 342 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Saleem Akhtar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 342 (SCMR) (Miss SAJIDA PARVEEN and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PRINCIPAL, DEAN, KHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE, PESHAWAR). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Hamid Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Mian Shakirullah Jan, Additional Advocate‑General, N: W.F.P. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 20th October, 1993.
- 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioners (Mr. Abdul Karim Kundi, Advocate) is, not in attendance in spite of an actual date having been given nor is there any formal application explaining his absence. Mr. Abdul Hamid Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record is, however, present to state that he was indisposed. He is allowed to see the record and cross‑examine the witness.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the orders of Peshawar High Court, Peshawar dated 8‑8‑1993, passed in C.M: No. 9/93, 8/93 and 7/93). ‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑‑Interim orders passed earlier by Supreme Court were recalled on perusal of record which had been summoned by the Supreme Court‑‑‑Case was directed to come up for further proceedings in the light of orders already passed on specified date.
Judgment & Decree
2. The learned counsel representing the petitioners (Mr. Abdul Karim Kundi, Advocate) is, not in attendance in spite of an actual date having been given nor is there any formal application explaining his absence. Mr. Abdul Hamid Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record is, however, present to state that he was indisposed. He is allowed to see the record and cross‑examine the witness.
3. In view of the record examined by us the interim order passed on 5‑9‑1992 in C.P.LA. 211‑P/93, order dated 20‑9‑1993 passed in C.P.LA. No.220‑P/93 and the order dated 22‑9‑1993 passed in C.P.LA. No.223‑P/93 are recalled.
4. To come up for further proceedings in the light of orders already passed on 12‑10‑1993. Statement of Mr. Ijaz Muhammad Siddiqui, Administrative Officer, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Peshawar, on solemn affirmation. I have brought the original result sheet registers, two in number, containing the results of all the candidates appearing at the Annual Examinations (Pre‑Medical Group) of 1989 and 1991. According to this record, Muhammad Irfanullah Khan appeared with Roll No. 51676 and obtained total 554 marks at the examination. The marks sheet bearing No‑50384 was issued on 22‑6‑1993. Another certificate may be for revivification issued on 26‑7‑1993 with serial No.50367. Sajida Parveen appeared with Roll No.30162 in the Examination of Pre‑Medical Group of 1991. According to the Register and the record she obtained 691 marks in all. Certificate Sr. No. 50350 dated 22‑6‑1993 followed by another Sr. No.50370 dated 26‑7‑1993 was issued in her name. S. Fariha Gillani appeared with Roll No.31041 and obtained total marks 624 and was issued certificates Nos.50349 dated 22‑6‑1993 and No.50369 dated 26‑7‑1993. X x x x x by Court If there is an application for recounting or rechecking of the marks obtained by a candidate then on mistake being found the correction is first made in these registers. Thereafter, a correction notification of the result issues and finally the Certificate incorporating the corrected marks is issued. I have checked the registers and the entries therein and find that no such correction was made with regard to these marks. I have seen in Court the original certificate which was filed by Irfanullah Khan in the Medical College. It bears Sr. No.3376 and the total marks obtained by him are shown to be
799. It bears no date. The Serial No. of the certificate submitted by S. Fariha Gillani in the Khyber Medical College is 110239. In this certificate the total marks obtained by her are shown to be
789. There is no date of the preparation and issue of this Certificate, also. I have seen also the Certificate submitted by Sajida Parveen in the Medical College for seeking admission therein. Its Serial No. is 105162. The total marks obtained by her are shown to be
791. The date of issue or preparation of this certificate is also not recorded. x x x, x x (By Mr. Abdul Hamid. Qureshi, Counsel for S. Fariha Gillani). A certificate is issued to the various colleges to which the candidates belong. After that, if any further attested copies are‑asked for, then an entry is made with regard to it in the register. With regard to the first copy i.e., sent to the Colleges concerned no entry exists in the register. There is no register maintained of the applications received for reverification of the results. However, as explained earlier, where corrections are to be made on reverification, necessary entries are made in the registers and results re-notified and the revised certificates issued to the candidates. A.A. /M‑1863/S Order accordingly.