2024 PLP 1419 (SCMR)
KAMRAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2024 PLP 1419 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Musarrat Hillani and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ |
| Parties | KAMRAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP 1419 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP 1419 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Musarrat Hillani and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP 1419 (SCMR) (KAMRAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zia-ur-Rahman Tajik, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 286-P of 2024).
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 392
Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)
In the FIR, allegation against the petitioner was that he inflicted chhuri/ dagger blows at the abdomen of the deceased/complainant, which proved fatal and the complainant succumbed to injuries on the following day
Through a supplementary statement of the deceased/ complainant, which was recorded by the police on the day of occurrence while the complainant was admitted in the hospital, he nominated the present petitioner to be the unknown culprit who committed the offence
Father of the deceased/ complainant and a prosecution witness after having seen the CCTV video of the occurrence showing petitioner stabbing the deceased/complainant, charged the petitioner for murder of the deceased in their statements recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C.
In the forensic video analysis made by the Punjab Forensic Science Agency of the CCTV video of the occurrence, no editing features were observed, hence the question of false implication did not arise in the instant matter
Cause of death, as recorded in the post-mortem report, was injuries to liver and major vessel of the abdomen
Recovered chhuri/ dagger, as per FSL report, was found to be stained with the human blood
In this way, the medical evidence and the recovery of crime weapon fully supported the prosecution case by connecting the petitioner with the commission of crime, which entailed capital punishment and fell within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.
Mere fact that the petitioner was a juvenile did not entitle him to the concession of bail as he was charged for a heinous offence, the punishment for which was death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for more than seven years
Petitioner was not entitled to the concession of bail
Bail application was, therefore, dismissed and leave was declined. Nemo for the Complainant. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUSARRAT HILALI, J.
The petitioner's post arrest bail was dismissed by the Peshawar High Court vide impugned order dated 19.02.2024 in case FIR No.1894 dated 27.10.2023 registered under 392, P.P.C. at Police Station City Mardan.
2. In the FIR, allegation against the petitioner is that he on the day of occurrence i.e. 27.01.2023 inflicted chhuri/dagger blows at the abdomen of the deceased/complainant namely Syed Nawazish Ali Shah, which proved fatal and the complainant succumbed to injuries on the following day.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. From perusal of record, it transpired that through a supplementary statement of the deceased/complainant, which was recorded by the police on the day of occurrence while the complainant was admitted in the hospital, wherein he nominated the present petitioner to be the unknown culprit who committed the offence. Imtiaz Hussain Shah, father of the deceased/ complainant and Anwar Bacha, PWs after having seen the CCTV video of the occurrence showing Kamran stabbing the deceased/complainant, charged the petitioner Kamran for murder of the deceased/complainant in their statements recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. In the forensic video analysis made by the Punjab Forensic Science Agency of the CCTV video of the occurrence, no editing features were observed, hence the question of false implication does not arise in the instant matter. The cause of death, as recorded in the Post-Mortem Report, was the injuries to liver and major vessel of the abdomen. The recovered chhuri/ dagger, as per FSL report, was found to be stained with the human blood. In this way, the medical evidence and the recovery of crime weapon fully support the prosecution case by connecting the petitioner with the commission of crime, which entails capital punishment and falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Mere fact that the petitioner was a juvenile does not entitle him to the concession of bail as he was charged for a heinous offence, the punishment for which is death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for more than seven years.
5. Hence, for foregoing reasons, the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of bail. The bail application is, therefore, dismissed and leave declined.
6. Above are the reasons of our short order of even date. MWA/K-9/SC Bail refused.