PCRLJ 1986

1986 P Cr (PLP)

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10‑T of 1986, decided on 9th April, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Parties MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Hassan Mahmood Sial for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 526‑‑Transfer of case‑‑Comments of Trial Court showing prejudice against accused--‑Case transferred in the interest of justice to another Court of competent jurisdiction. Tassaddaq Hussain Jilani, A.A.‑G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑S. 526‑‑Transfer of case‑‑Comments of Trial Court showing prejudice against accused--‑Case transferred in the interest of justice to another Court of competent jurisdiction. Hassan Mahmood Sial for Petitioner. Tassaddaq Hussain Jilani, A.A.‑G. for the State. This is an application for the transfer of case F.I.R. No. 332, dated 27‑12‑1984 of Police Station Mian Channu, under section 302, P.P.C. pending decision before Malik Zulfiqar Ali, Additional Sessions Judge, Khanewal, to some other Court of competent jurisdiction. On the examination of the parawise comments of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, I find that in para. No. 6, he stated:‑ "The alleged inferences and the apprehensions are figment and may kindly be discouraged in the interest of justice so that A Sessions trials are not made a play thing at the whims of irresponsible litigants." which shows that his mind has become prejudiced against the accused because of the transfer application filed against him, and as such, it would be in the interest of justice that the case is transferred from his Court to some other Court of competent jurisdiction. The case is, therefore, transferred from his Court to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Khanewal, who shall conclude the proceedings within two month under intimation to the Additional Registrar of this Bench. S. A. Appeal accepted.