Forum > Criminal Law & Procedure > Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) vs Section 302 PPC: Does a private feud murder targeting an off-duty officer constitute terrorism?

Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) vs Section 302 PPC: Does a private feud murder targeting an off-duty officer constitute terrorism?

L
Posted by Legal Seeker 7/7/2026, 7:42:14 PM
🔗

Linked Legal Reference

2026 S C M R 972

View Case →
0

In a case where an accused attacked a police escort to kill an enemy in police custody due to a private blood feud, the prosecution added terrorism charges under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) 1997. The defense argues that since the target and motive stem from a private enmity, it cannot fall under terrorism. What is the scope of ATA charges in such situations?

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد

1 Comments

Sign in to share your thoughts and participate in this legal discussion.

Login / Register
0
A
Admin 7/7/2026, 7:42:14 PM

The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of 2026 SCMR 972 (Sajjad alias Kala v. The State) clarified that serious violence systematically targeting law enforcement agencies, even if stemming from a private feud or enmity, acquires the character of terrorism when it targets those upholding the rule of law. The Court held that if any harm is caused to an official (such as an assault on police custody) even outside their official duty hours on account of their official role, it is treated as terrorism. Such actions fall squarely under Section 6(1)(m) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, and the trial court is fully authorized to prosecute and sentence the accused under the ATA alongside Section 302(b) PPC.