2007 PLP 1045 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD YOUSIF alias DODO and 5 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1045 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Anwar Zaheer Jamali, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YOUSIF alias DODO and 5 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1045 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1045 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Anwar Zaheer Jamali, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1045 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD YOUSIF alias DODO and 5 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Learned Additional Advocate-General Sindh candidly concedes for admission of applicants to protective pre-arrest bail for some short period so that they may avail remedy in accordance with law.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.334, 337-A(i), F(i), 504, 506, 114, 147, 148 & 149
High Court, without touching to merits of the case, admitted the accused to protective bail for a period of seven days on their furnishing surety amount and surety bond with the observations that the facility of protective pre-arrest bail, would cease to have force on expiry of said period of seven days or on surrendering of accused before the trial Court, whichever be earlier
If however, the accused failed to surrender before the trial Court within the stipulated period of seven days, the surety furnished before the Court would stand forfeited. Khadim Hussain D. Solangi for Applicants. Masood A. Noorani A.A.-G. for Opponent.
Judgment & Decree
ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, J.--Granted.
2. By this application under section 498, Cr.P.C. the applicants seek pre-arrest protective bail in Crime No.2 of 2007, Police Station Chhachar wherein they have been charged with the allegation of commission of crime punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 117, 504, 506(2), 334, 337-A(i) and 337-F(i) P.P.C. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to political rivalry, the-applicants have been falsely nominated in the F.I.R. They are law abiding citizens, therefore, they intend to surrender and seek remedy from the concerned Court for grant of pre-arrest bail in the matter, but due to the fear of their arrest in approaching the Sessions Court, they are unable to do so. He, therefore, requests that applicants may be admitted to protective bail so that they may appear before the trial Court and seek further remedy in accordance with law. Learned Additional Advocate-General Sindh candidly concedes for admission of applicants to protective pre-arrest bail for some short period so that they may avail remedy in accordance with law. Considering the submissions of learned counsel but without touching to the merits of the case, the applicants are admitted to protective bail for a period of seven days from today on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court. The facility of protective pre-arrest bail shall cease to have force on expiry of aforesaid period or on surrendering of applicants before the trial Court, whichever is earlier. In case applicants fail to surrender before the trial Court within the stipulated period, surety furnished before this Court shall stand forfeited. H.B.T./M-23/K Order accordingly.