1989 PLP 1205 (SCMR)
NAUSHER AHMAD KHAN and 8 others‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and 3 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1205 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | NAUSHER AHMAD KHAN and 8 others‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and 3 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1205 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1205 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1205 (SCMR) (NAUSHER AHMAD KHAN and 8 others‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and 3 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Dr. Khalid Ranjha, Advocate for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 25th February, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order, dated 4th April 1983 of Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, m Writ Petition No.466 of 1983). ‑‑‑S.10‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑State land‑‑Horse‑Breeding Scheme‑‑Original tenant having died there were two claimants for the allotment, one predecessor‑in‑interest of the petitioners and the other respondent, both being sons of original tenant‑‑Elder brother of the two died during pendency of the matter before Collector‑‑Tenancy was allotted to the respondent‑‑Petitioners' (successors‑in‑interest of the other brother) appeal, revision and writ petition having been dismissed they sought leave to appeal to Supreme Court which was granted as leave was granted in two cases where similar questions were raised. C.P. 220 of 1982 on 31st March, 1988 and in C.P. 940 of 1982 on 13th August, 1988 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought, against the dismissal by the High Court, of a Constitutional petition which had arisen out of an allotment of State land under the Horse‑Breeding Tenancy Scheme. Hassan Ali the original tenant having died there were two claimants for the allotment ‑ One Ahmed Khan the predecessor‑in‑interest of the petitioners and the other Waryam respondent No.4, both being sons of Hassan Ali. The Remount Officer had recommended the name of respondent No.4. During the pendency of the matter before the Collector, Ahmed Khan who was the elder brother of the two died. The tenancy was allotted to respondent No.4. Petitioners' appeal, revision and writ petition having been dismissed they have now sought leave to appeal. Similar questions having earlier been raised, leave to appeal was granted in CP‑220 of 1982 on 31st March 1988 and in CP‑940 of 1982 on 13th August, 1988. Leave to appeal is granted in this case also. Security Rs.5,
000. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all additional documents which would be necessary for disposal of the appeal. This appeal shall be heard alongwith the other cases. M.BA./N‑147/S Leave granted.