2009 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUL SATTAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDUL SATTAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL SATTAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 561-A
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34
Application for exercising inherent powers of High Court
Counsel for applicant/complainant, after going through the papers of investigation, had conceded that no evidence was available on record for putting female or any other person on trial for the murder of applicant's brother, as all the witnesses in whose presence the deceased had died had stated before the Investigating Officer that the deceased had died natural death, and nobody had administered poison to him
Sons and daughters of deceased had clearly stated that their father died natural death and nobody had administered poison to him
No exception could be taken to the order of the Magistrate for granting approval for the disposal of case in "A" class.
Judgment & Decree
After going through the papers of investigation, the learned counsel for the appellant concedes that there is no evidence for putting Mst. Parveen or any other person on trial for the murder of applicant's brother Farman Khan as all the witnesses in whose presence the deceased had died have stated before the Investigating Officer that the deceased had died natural death and nobody had administered poison to him. His sons Irfan Khan, Suleman, Jibran, Umair and daughters Mst". Hina Khan, Mst. Shela Gul, Mst. Ambreen and Mst. Mehvish have clearly stated that their father died natural death and nobody administered poison to him. In such circumstance, no exception can be taken to the order of the Magistrate for granting approval for the disposal of case in 'A' class. The application, being meritless, is dismissed. H.B.T./A-37/K Application dismissed.