2007 PLP 3095 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD AYYUB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 3095 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AYYUB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 3095 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 3095 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 3095 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD AYYUB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Judgment & Decree
FAZAL-E-MIRAN CHAUHAN, J.
The petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.1003 dated 4-10-2006 registered under section 489-F, ,P.P.C, at Police Station. Gujjar Singh, Lahore.
2. Learned counsel for 'the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the case due to mala fide intention of the .police as well as complainant and that the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.
3. Conversely, learned D.P.P.G. has opposed the grant of bail, He contends that the petitioner committed heinous offence, therefore, he is not entitled to any relief.
4. Heard. Record perused.
5. Admittedly, the petitioner issued cheque to the complainant which was dishonoured by the concerned bank on its presentation and on the complaint of complainant criminal .case was registered against him. There is sufficient material available on record to connect the accused with the commission offence. In view of the growing rate of crimes especially in field of business transaction there is no escape from interpreting relevant provisions of law in a strict manner and to apply them firmly in order to run the business in the country. No ground is made out for grant of bail to the petitioner. Resultantly, this petition having no merit is dismissed. H.B.T/M-451/L Bail refused.