2010 PLP 280 (GBLR)
SHAKIRULLAH alias DOCTOR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 280 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J. and Muhammad Yaqoob, J |
| Parties | SHAKIRULLAH alias DOCTOR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 280 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 280 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J. and Muhammad Yaqoob, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 280 (GBLR) (SHAKIRULLAH alias DOCTOR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Haq Nawaz, Senior Advocate for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 302/324/109/34
Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss. 6 & 7
Qatl-e-amd; attempt to commit qatl-e-amd and abetment
Case was pending for the last 4/5 years without any progress
Trial Court was directed to submit report to the Registrar of Supreme Appellate Court regarding inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial, within a fortnight for perusal of the Supreme Appellate Court and order in chamber.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, C.J.
The learned counsel when confronted that in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Khan Asfand Yar Wali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC 607) and Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi v. The State (PLD 2003 SC 668). The petitioner could maintain a writ petition before the Chief Court for the appropriate relief, he without further agitating the matter before this Court has stated that he would like to file a Writ Petition in the Chief Court. This petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. It is stated that trial in the present case is pending for the last 4/5 years without any progress. The learned trial Judge will submit report to the Registrar of this Court regarding inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial within a fortnight for our perusal and appropriate order in Chamber. H.B.T./66/Glt. Order accordingly.