2010L4327 (PLP)
Raja MUHAMMAD MUNIR — Petitioner Versus Mian MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2010L4327 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J |
| Parties | Raja MUHAMMAD MUNIR — Petitioner Versus Mian MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010L4327 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010L4327 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010L4327 (PLP) (Raja MUHAMMAD MUNIR — Petitioner Versus Mian MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shaukat Rafique Bajwa for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos.2, 3 and 4.
- 2. The comments of this petition submitted by the learned Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Punjab, Lahore show that the learned counsel for respondent No.1 before the said Court had already "very humbly and gently tendered unconditional apology on his own as well as on behalf of the respondent No.1 or the complainant" and that is why the said learned Court had "dropped the idea of moving" this Court in that regard.
Headnotes / Summary
Art.204
Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976), Ss.3 & 4
Alleged contemner, entered appearance in person and had on his own behalf as well as on behalf of other two had tendered unconditional apology feeling sorry for what had happened before the Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption
Comments to said petition submitted by Senior Special Judge, had shown that in view of unconditional apology on behalf of the alleged contemners said Court had dropped the idea of moving High Court in that regard
Counsel for the petitioner, felt satisfied with the unconditional apology tendered by the contemnors, and thus no further proceedings in that regard were called for. Respondent No.1 in person. Mrs. Farzana Shahzad Khan Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State Respondent No.5.
Judgment & Decree
ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.
Respondent No.1 has entered appearance in person and has on his own behalf as well as on behalf of respondents Nos.2 and 3 tendered a written apology feeling sorry for whatever had happened before the learned Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Punjab, Lahore on 7-2-2009. In the written apology respondent No.1 has maintained that he has great respect for all the Courts and while tendering unconditional apology he has thrown himself at the mercy of this Court. He has further maintained that he never intended to disgrace or humiliate any Court and he had no intention to insult the learned Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Punjab Lahore on 7-2-2009.
2. The comments of this petition submitted by the learned Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Punjab, Lahore show that the learned counsel for respondent No.1 before the said Court had already "very humbly and gently tendered unconditional apology on his own as well as on behalf of the respondent No.1 or the complainant" and that is why the said learned Court had "dropped the idea of moving" this Court in that regard.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner feels satisfied with the unconditional apology tendered by respondent No.1 and in the circumstances of this case too have felt that no further proceedings in this regard are called for. This petition is, therefore, disposed of. H.B.T./M-314/L Order accordingly.